Skip to content

General

General

Categories

603 results found

  1. 4 votes
    Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    1 comment  ·  Admin →
    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
  2. We discussed it with Joel during his visit in Cambridge, UK. It would be beneficial to see Test Description on Test Set Run view (above the steps). Test Descrption contains essential test information and having them visible on this screen would help to understand the context of the steps without need to click multiple times to see it. Hoovering in upper right corner shows that, however it is unreadable in some cases.

    3 votes
    Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
  3. Dashboards and reports should be able to be created to report on multiple projects. If an organization is able to report on all the activity within Practitest, it will allow Executive Leadership the ability to see the entire workload of what is being processed via Practitest.

    It really will show the immense activity accomplished during testing as a whole.

    10 votes
    Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
  4. Sometimes we include the same test case a couple of times in one test set, but with different parameters. Unfortunately now we must edit those parameters one by one - and this is a lot of clicking.
    I can see 2 solutions:
    1) Allow modifying parameters directly in test set table
    2) On parameters screen differentiate parameters by test case instance/number

    12 votes
    Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
  5. After clicking 'Fail & Issue', a JIRA ticket is created with the 'Summary' field populated automatically with "Bug reported from test: " followed by the test name. This can make the name unnecessarily long or potentially not follow existing naming conventions for a particular JIRA project. It would be nice to set a custom value for this pre-populated text, instead of editing it manually each time. For example, I use "PT Report: " as an abbreviated version. A company might want an even shorter code.

    It might also be a handy feature to choose to put this text at the…

    5 votes
    Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    1 comment  ·  Admin →
    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
  6. 7 votes
    Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
  7. It would be nice if there was a way to include photos and attachments that are included in test in the final report for reference. It can be odd at times to have a test that references a picture or attachment and it does not show up in the report.

    32 votes
    Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    started  ·  6 comments  ·  Admin →
    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
  8. As a tester when I would like to be able to set tests to 'Part passed' (i.e passed with minor issues). This would be useful for so that minor issues, that do not block the release can be reported against a test and do not get lost, and reports can also be run showing a 'passed' status. The test does not completely pass, but you do not want it to show as a big red fail in a report - the issues that remain do not block the release

    2 votes
    Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
  9. As a tester, I would like to be able to use the 'linked bug' flag in a filter selection criteria on tests
    This would enable me to find tests that may have been marked as 'passed' as they meet the release criteria, but still may have minor issues outstanding against them. i.e. create a filter of tests that have a linked bugs regardless of the test 'run status'.

    3 votes
    Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    1 comment  ·  Admin →
    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
  10. 4 votes
    Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    1 comment  ·  Admin →
    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
  11. As a user I would like to use the two way integration with the possibility of being able to add manually issues. Example: 2 teams will integrate with PractiTest and the 3rd will still add manually issues since they all work on the same project.

    1 vote
    Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
  12. If you want to do a bulk edit of a field for the tests in a test set you are limited to what you are allowed to see on the page (max 100 now). If I have a few hundred I currently have to go to each page and do a bulk edit. What is even more tedious is after I do one it resets back to 1-100 so I have to first double check I did it correctly for say 201-200, etc. This functionality is available when doing bulk edits of tests (where it asks if you would like…

    34 votes
    Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
  13. When I do permutations over TestSets in the upper part there is TestSet ID. Can it be changed to TestSet name? I often do permutations of many TestSets one after another and sometimes forget which TestSet I have now.

    1 vote
    Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
  14. A test is added to the Test Library that contains parameter values. That test is added to a Test Set multiple times with a variation in the parameter value. Each parameter test is run multiple times, some pass, some may fail. The overall pass of the test set instance can be determined by the admin user with pass fail criteria (percentage based) with a specification on the required number of runs per test instance. Eg. If there is only 1 pass and 99 fails the overall parameter instance should not be pass when there is a 100% pass run requirement.…

    1 vote
    Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
  15. I would like to search in a broader context, not just in a specific project, but search through all the projects

    2 votes
    Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
  16. 1 vote
    Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    1 comment  ·  Admin →
    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
  17. I spotted Practitest is the reason of huge memory usage in FF browser with Windows 7. Usage is gradually increasing, especially when I open it in few tabs. It is laggy as well, but only within tabs where I have Practitest.

    After closing tabs with Practitest memory is not released.

    1 vote
    Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
  18. There are several fields in JIRA that we need to be reflected in PractiTest. In particular we use a fix in version field to associate releases in Jira and we need that field to be updated in the corresponding PractiTest ticket. Other fields such as priority should be mapped and synchronized.

    We spend a copious amount of time with each release/sprint updating Requirements in PractiTest to reflect what the PMs have assigned for the current development cycle. Each time a requirement falls out of scope or a new on is added, we have to manually update PractiTest.

    14 votes
    Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
  19. In Firefox browser I spotted following situation - when I click on link to attachment, PractiTest opens a file instead of call browser's dialog with option to choice - open or download a file.

    1 vote
    Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
  20. It would be useful to add Status on steps so that a single test can be divided in different steps which should be evaluated singularly

    3 votes
    Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    Christine responded

    Hi Fabrizio,

    Thanks for your feature request.

    Could you please clarify it?

    Thanks in advance.

    Best regards,
    Christine

  • Don't see your idea?