I would like to be able to reorder tests in a testset more easily, and preferably in bulk.
Generally I want to arrange the tests by component, or tester, or ID; all of the useful sorting options I can think of are currently available as column headers.
It would be very useful to have a sorting feature which would allow quick reordering by column headers. For example, sort by tester and then component. Whith that, each tester can click "Run" on their first test case, and PractiTest would go through their tests, in order of component.
A simple option would be to allow tests to be run in the order as seen on screen. Eg clicking "Run now" at the top will run the tests in the 'normal ' order, and clicking "Run" next to a test case runs them in the order as seen on screen (or a new button).

Currently I have to add test cases to a testset in the order I want them to be run (mostly using several filters), and then adjust manually as needed. This can be quite time consuming, especially for large testsets, when I an simply click on a column header and see the test cases displayed in the order I need them to be run.

Currently it appears that filters can only be created using OR statements that meet the same item type which can reduce the ability to find what you're looking for when your test library gets to be particularly large.

For example I can create a filter that says:
(Name is this or that) and tag is this

And cannot make a filter with:
Name is this or tag is this

Or advancing even further to:
(Name is this and tag is this) or (name is that and tag is that)

It would be nice to be able to have this grouping as it would very much help narrow down particularly large test libraries.

Current integration with ADO is only syncing the Description information section from ADO to PractiTest but in most cases there are multiple information sections depending on the Work Item type in ADO like Acceptance Criteria for requirements and Repro Steps, System Info and Acceptance criteria for a bug in ADO. It will be great if the syncing is not limited to just Description information section but is smart enough to sync all the information sections to PractiTest when the sync is done.
Also there are other important fields like Release Date and Priority for the Requirements which must be synced across.

Also if we can sync Priority and Severity for bugs that will be awesome.

And If we can make to sync all the standard fields for work item then it will be great and best thing to have

If you want to do a bulk edit of a field for the tests in a test set you are limited to what you are allowed to see on the page (max 100 now). If I have a few hundred I currently have to go to each page and do a bulk edit. What is even more tedious is after I do one it resets back to 1-100 so I have to first double check I did it correctly for say 201-200, etc. This functionality is available when doing bulk edits of tests (where it asks if you would like to do all or just the selected ones).

Currently when the requirements and bugs are synced from ADO, the comments are not synced.

For requirements the comments have valuable information reflecting the changes and doubts which are important for a tester to know while creating test cases so it is very critical to include the comments as well.Also if a tester has certain doubts on a requirements if there is a 2 way sync he can just post the comments on the PractiTest and they should flow to the linked requirement card in the ADO.

For bugs, since the developers won't always have access to PractiTest, the will post the comments around fix and status on the ADO comments. So it is critical for the comments to flow from ADO to PRactiTest. Also when the tester finishes testing the bug he should have ability to post his findings in the practiTest and the 2 way sync should put those comments back to the bug in the ADO. Also the tester may have further clearifications to seek from developer so he should be able to post the comment in PractiTest and it should flow thru to ADO linked bug card.