560 results found
-
Versioning test cases
Feature to versioning of test cases, allowing comparisons of differences and return to previous versions.
71 votes -
execution progress graph with costume fields
We would like to have execution progress graph displaying custom fields.
example:
a execution graph with ("automated", "planned for automation",...) fields.40 votes -
Github with Two-Way Integration
Please add two-way integration with Github. Not everyone's on Atlassian products such as Jira, Bitbucket, et al.
40 votes -
make requirements links visible when executing a test
When executing a test case one of the key things you'll want to reference are the requirements, so logically they should be accessible.
33 votes -
Include pictures / attachments in reports.
It would be nice if there was a way to include photos and attachments that are included in test in the final report for reference. It can be odd at times to have a test that references a picture or attachment and it does not show up in the report.
32 votes -
Ability to sync the comments from requirements and bugs from ADO to PractiTest and vice versa
Currently when the requirements and bugs are synced from ADO, the comments are not synced.
For requirements the comments have valuable information reflecting the changes and doubts which are important for a tester to know while creating test cases so it is very critical to include the comments as well.Also if a tester has certain doubts on a requirements if there is a 2 way sync he can just post the comments on the PractiTest and they should flow to the linked requirement card in the ADO.
For bugs, since the developers won't always have access to PractiTest, the will…
28 votes -
Ability to add a test case to a test set by writing the test number/range
As mentioned with the Ability to add a test case item, we tried filters; it’s cumbersome to have to shift gears and create a new filter every time that we want to look up / search for something new. It clutters things up as then there is the maintenance and scrolling to contend with as well.
26 votes -
Add requirement link to an issue when posted to Jira
When an issue is created from a test, the associated requirements could be linked (if Jira requirements, then the Jira requirement link) to the issue document (perhaps appended to description, or to a field defined in Practitest by the user) before being sent to Jira.
Why? So in Jira a developer can click straight on the requirement to see what should happen, rather than dig through a number of screens to access the requirement26 votes -
Have option to add field or custom field to an item in dashboard
I'd like to have the option to select fields in items displayed at the dashboard.
Example, if i have custom field of priority/severity, i'd like to be able to add it to the items displayed at the dashboard item.
To be more specific, if i add an item with "Test" entity and "latest" item type, i'd like to see the test priority as well as the existing fields in the table23 votes -
Sync attachments from ADO to PRactiTest and Vice Versa
Currently we are not syncing the attachments from ADO requirements or bugs to PractiTest nor from PractiTest bugs to ADO. It would be great if we can do a 2 way sync for the requirements as well.
Many times the big requirements have attached docs which are essential for a tester to see to create test cases.
Bugs in ADO will have screenshots and log files attached and they need to sync across to the PractiTest as well.
Also when a bug is created from PractiTest to flow thru to ADO it will/should have screen shots attached along with other…22 votes -
Test case templates
Allow creation and selection of test case templates. These could have standardized titles, step names, etc. Example:
Title: "My App: <component>: <test>"
Step 1: "SETUP"
Step 5: "CLEANUP"20 votes -
Conditional Mandatory Fields - If I have a field that is value X, then make one or two ther fields mandatory to fill in (or select).
Conditional Mandatory Fields - If I have a field that is value X, then make one or two the selected fields mandatory to fill in (or select). If value is not X then either grey out the fields or make the other one or two fields not required.
18 votes -
clone or copy views in the tests library
For example we have a view with a lot of child views and now We would like to create the same view but with a different parent filter. So we would like to clone the existing tree and modify it instead of creating it from scratch.
17 votes -
Include comments in the PractiTest API
Include comments in the PractiTest API.
17 votes -
Able to create a single dashboard across mutiple projects
Would like to have a single dashboard that can cover multiple projects. As a manager of projects this would be highly benefitcial.
17 votes -
Add new value to standard or custom fields via API
In a context of automated test, it could be valuable to be able to append new values to fields already existent via API.
At the moment, we can only replace the entire Field with new possible values. And if something goes wrong, I feel like there's a high chance to lose information.
17 votes -
Create the ability to add multiple instances of a test case to a test set
When creating a manual parameterised test set, multiple instances of a test case need to be added. At present this needs to be done individually. It is suggested that there is an option to 'Add multiple instances' to the dropdown menu by the '+ Add selected tests' (underneath Add all test in view). This triggers an input box to appear where a two digit number can be entered, and all test cases ticked will be added that number of times
16 votes -
Ability to get all filters for a project through the API
We need the ability to get all filters for a project through the practitest test API. Currently we are trying to use the API to generate an internal report based on test sets in a test filter.
We can filter the test sets by the filter-id but we have no way to prompt the user which filters are available to generate the report on.
Maybe something like:
https://api.practitest.com/api/v2/projects/YOUR_PROJECT_ID/filters.json16 votes -
Allow the account admin the ability to create reports/dashboards across projects.
Dashboards and reports should be able to be created to report on multiple projects. If an organization is able to report on all the activity within Practitest, it will allow Executive Leadership the ability to see the entire workload of what is being processed via Practitest.
It really will show the immense activity accomplished during testing as a whole.
16 votes -
In The Task Board As Well As Filtering by Person why not filter by TestSet Filter & Test Filter -
That way you can multi purpose it for multiple test runs.
15 votes
- Don't see your idea?