70 results found
-
execution progress graph with costume fields
We would like to have execution progress graph displaying custom fields.
example:
a execution graph with ("automated", "planned for automation",...) fields.45 votes -
Have option to add field or custom field to an item in dashboard
I'd like to have the option to select fields in items displayed at the dashboard.
Example, if i have custom field of priority/severity, i'd like to be able to add it to the items displayed at the dashboard item.
To be more specific, if i add an item with "Test" entity and "latest" item type, i'd like to see the test priority as well as the existing fields in the table23 votes -
Give users the ability to add custom fields at Test Step Level.
You should give the users to add fields at test step level.
They should be allowed to Add things like Test Data for a particular step like Large Queries it it. For us the Test Precondition or Test Description or Test Name cannot be used for that purpose.
13 votes -
Firecracker integration | add fields to configuration by XML properties and not only attributes
The idea is to be able to add custom modifications to the practitest configuration when using firecracker by using the XML properties in addition to current option by using XML attributes
13 votes -
Improve parameter handling
Sometimes we include the same test case a couple of times in one test set, but with different parameters. Unfortunately now we must edit those parameters one by one - and this is a lot of clicking.
I can see 2 solutions:
1) Allow modifying parameters directly in test set table
2) On parameters screen differentiate parameters by test case instance/number12 votes -
Integration with Katalon Studio
I am exploring the open source Automation tool Katalon Studio for automating test cases for mobile and web applications. I would greatly appreciate if Practitest can provide 2 way integration with this tool.
11 votes -
Give permissions for individual fields to certain users
I want to be able to give certain team members permission to edit picklists on only some fields ? eg) we have a custom field 'Run on Build' that we want all team members to be able to add values to, but don't want them to be able to have general access to edit values of all other fields
11 votes -
Ability to copy a filter
Have the ability to copy a filter within and across modules.
11 votes -
link requirement to requirement
Ability to link a requirement to another. This can be another option in Traceability tab where we currently link tests and issues.
7 votes -
Filters by users which are no longer part of this project
Filters by users which are no longer part of this project
7 votes -
When creating a Run dashboard item, allow to select Instances/Testsets/Tests fields vfor axis
Currently when we create dashboard item for Instances, we can select fields from Testsets, and Tests
When we create the same item for Runs, only run fields appear. Can we also enable such thing for the Run dashboard items? Including the instance fields.7 votes -
Need the ability to Create/Read/Update/Delete filters through the API
Need the ability to Create/Read/Update/Delete filters through the API
6 votes -
The ability to create a filter tree from a single screen rather than having to create individual filters and link them together
The ability to create a filter tree from a single screen rather than having to create individual filters and link them together
6 votes -
Create an option in the report center sector for generating a report with our companies logo as default at the right top corner
So when i go to the Report Center that it will be possible to upload our logo in a report.
6 votes -
Mandate screenshot or attachments to be saved during test step exeuction
The ability to mandate in the test library, at test step level, that a screenshot or attachment must be saved at the step during exeuction.
During execution it should not be possible to proceed if the screnshot or attachment has not been added.
This is crucial for compliance where test evidence is checked by auditors.6 votes -
Add status for users in user setup
In current version the basis for access and invoicing is users defined in the user setup. In a project when testers are involved now and then, the administrator must manually remove the users to have control of the costs. When the users is supposed to do testing activities later, the admin must then manually add all users. This is very time consuming in big projects. However, it should be possible to set a user inactive by changing a status that will prevent the user from having access to the project and also will exclude this user from the payment.
4 votes -
[Dash Board] Excution Progress chart should support filter with more than 10000 instances
Current ly Excution Progress chart only support fillter of project with less than 10 000 instance (total instance of whole project).
4 votes -
Linked Requirements in Requirements Traceability
Expand traceability in Requiremnets to include Linked Requirements., This will enable association between Business Requirements to Functional Requirements etc.
Also supports a heirachy of requirements (drill down).
It appears that the change would be relatively simple given the existing Traceability functions in Requirements for Linked Tests and Linked Issues. Just add Linked Requirements.
4 votes -
Set a default time zone for the account
When new users are added they are initially set up with the time set to UTC (GMT). For most users this is not appropriate and they need to go into settings to set their own time zone. This even applies to users in the UK who need to select London in order to get the daylight saving time applied automatically in the summer. If we could have the facility for an administrator to set the default time zone for an account then most new users would be set up with the right time.
4 votes -
Create Pie Chart with group of values
I would be interested by having a way to group different values of a field used to create a pie chart in 1 "super value"
To give an example:
For the Requirement items, I would like to have a pie with only 2 values :
- Not Covered
- Covered
As of today, we have: Not Covered, No Run, Passed, Failed...
I would like to be able to present a dashboard to my manager with the value "Covered" including all the values except Not Covered and Not Covered.3 votes
- Don't see your idea?