Skip to content

General

General

Categories

(thinking…)

I suggest you ...

You've used all your votes and won't be able to post a new idea, but you can still search and comment on existing ideas.

There are two ways to get more votes:

  • When an admin closes an idea you've voted on, you'll get your votes back from that idea.
  • You can remove your votes from an open idea you support.
  • To see ideas you have already voted on, select the "My feedback" filter and select "My open ideas".
(thinking…)

Enter your idea and we'll search to see if someone has already suggested it.

If a similar idea already exists, you can support and comment on it.

If it doesn't exist, you can post your idea so others can support it.

Enter your idea and we'll search to see if someone has already suggested it.

10 results found

  1. Please provide option to link Test set with Requirement.

    Please provide option to link a Test Set with a requirement. As of now we have to link one by one all the test cases for a requirement and its time consuming when we have big projects with 300+ test cases.

    67 votes
    Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    Close
    Close
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    planned  ·  2 comments  ·  Admin →
    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    Close
    Close

  2. Ability to sync the comments from requirements and bugs from ADO to PractiTest and vice versa

    Currently when the requirements and bugs are synced from ADO, the comments are not synced.

    For requirements the comments have valuable information reflecting the changes and doubts which are important for a tester to know while creating test cases so it is very critical to include the comments as well.Also if a tester has certain doubts on a requirements if there is a 2 way sync he can just post the comments on the PractiTest and they should flow to the linked requirement card in the ADO.

    For bugs, since the developers won't always have access to PractiTest, the will…

    28 votes
    Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    Close
    Close
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    planned  ·  0 comments  ·  Admin →
    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    Close
    Close

  3. Reviewing Test Cases Support

    Is there a way of making reviewing test cases easier?

    We can mark the tests ready for review, but would be easy if we have some GUI support to add the review comments to the steps or description.

    We don't have to rely on other tools to send review comments etc if it is supported in PT itself.

    17 votes
    Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    Close
    Close
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    planned  ·  1 comment  ·  Admin →
    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    Close
    Close

  4. Add Collision detect on Test edition

    We have encountered situation when I have edited the Tests while my colleague had it open and editing. I have saved the changes first and when he saved his, mine were lost. It is quite a big problem in distributed large teams. Please take a look.

    5 votes
    Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    Close
    Close
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    planned  ·  2 comments  ·  Admin →
    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    Close
    Close

  5. Always show Requirement title

    We link 'commenter' users to a requirement with this link (sans /edit/)

    https://prod.practitest.com/p/xxxx/requirements/xxxxx/

    This provides a nice read-only view of the req. The problem is that the req title does not appear anywhere on the page, only the description and other fields.

    Pls always display the requirement title on this page.

    3 votes
    Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    Close
    Close
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    planned  ·  0 comments  ·  Admin →
    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    Close
    Close

  6. Provide ways to Archive Dashboards in PractiTest

    Hello,
    Currently, there are no ways to Archive Dashboards in PractiTest. As a matter of urgency, please implement ways to Archive Dashboards in PractiTest?

    For instance, some Teams on a 2-weeks per month Sprints would like to never delete their Dashboards, but keep them for future references to their Leadership team's consumption.

    Without a Dashboard Archive feature in PT, the number of dashboards will go pretty fast; and will become difficult for the QA teams and their Leadership teams to navigate.

    PT Team, please consider implementing Archive Dashboards feature in PractiTest.

    Thank you!

    Best regards,
    Felix

    Best regards,
    Felix

    2 votes
    Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    Close
    Close
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    planned  ·  1 comment  ·  Admin →
    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    Close
    Close

  7. include the ability to add tests all at once instead of individually when adding tests on the traceability tab in requirements.

    We often add 10 or more test cases to each requirement which means having to click "Add" that number of times to link each test case. It would be nice if there was a way to add all of them at once.

    1 vote
    Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    Close
    Close
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    planned  ·  0 comments  ·  Admin →
    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    Close
    Close

  8. Support for auto filters for more than 2 levels

    Allow to create auto filters on more than 2 levels

    0 votes
    Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    Close
    Close
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    planned  ·  0 comments  ·  Admin →
    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    Close
    Close

  9. Remove auto filter limitation

    Support the option to create more than 50 auto filters per module

    0 votes
    Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    Close
    Close
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    planned  ·  0 comments  ·  Admin →
    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    Close
    Close

  10. Ability to quickly sort list field custom field's values in reverse alphabetical or sorted order

    0 votes
    Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    Close
    Close
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    planned  ·  0 comments  ·  Admin →
    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    Close
    Close
  • Don't see your idea?