Skip to content

General

General

Categories

561 results found

  1. For example:
    Step 5: "Select the folder with today's date"

    - Condition: If folder does not exist, follow these steps (link to other steps, or insert in situ).

    If the folder does exist, have the ability to skip the does not exist condition.
    Sort of like an if-then-else statement inside a Test Case

    3 votes
    Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    0 comments  ·  Admin →
    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
  2. We have made some dashboards for our progress, one that shows all sprints, and one for each sprint. That means that there will be many dashboards, so a possibility to group dashboards would be nice. So that we could have just “All Sprints” as a tab, but a hover on the tab shows a menu for each of the Sprint dashboards.

    3 votes
    Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    0 comments  ·  Admin →
    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
  3. 10 votes
    Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
  4. When adding test cases to test sets, the pop-up you have to select them in has no option to sort the listed test cases - which makes us very dependent on detailed filters or the list becomes hard to work with for us with +10 sub-pages to click between to find the right test case.
    We suggest to enable sorting on the columns, so we can sort by name or ID.

    1 vote
    Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
  5. Right now it will just write "Updated step " and you cannot know what step was updated, were if you have step names it will write "Updated step [step name]"
    We find it time consuming to always name steps, and step name and step description are often duplicates, so we would like to have the option to not user step names, but still get the history when steps are changed

    1 vote
    Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    0 comments  ·  Admin →
    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
  6. 1 vote
    Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    0 comments  ·  Admin →
    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
  7. BDD automation has a feature call "Scenario Outline", where you can define a table data for the test. This feature is based in step parameters.
    PractiTest hosts also a step parameters feature, although the table data is defined at run time, unlike BDD automation, which is defined at test definition time
    This can be solved with a custom field hosting the table data, where automation framework can retrieve it using the API, but the problem is when we try to create a run.
    I have tried FireCracker with a Scenario Outline test and the report is not accurate because it…

    4 votes
    Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
  8. Currently, I am using an extraction of issues and test statues to identify in Excel:
    - Failed tests linked to closed issues => for testers to update the status of the test
    - Failed tests not linked to any issue => for testers to link them to an issue
    - Highlight the issues that need to be replied to or retested (e.g. rejected, fixed)

    This involves:
    - Duplicating lines where tests are linked to several issues
    - Vlookups between issue statues and test statuses

    My idea would be to have triggers in the UI and perhaps also by email to…

    1 vote
    Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    0 comments  ·  Admin →
    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
  9. 2 way integration into zenhub.

    3 votes
    Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    0 comments  ·  Admin →
    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
  10. I am imagining the following to avoid using the green monster.

    Issue form with the following fields:
    • Reach (value dropdown 20)
    • Impact(value dropdown 0.5)
    • Confidence (value dropdown 100)
    • Estimate (value dropdown 10)
    • Score (calculation: 200.5100/10=100 from the above fields)

    6 votes
    Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    1 comment  ·  Admin →
    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
  11. 4 votes
    Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
  12. 4 votes
    Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    1. if a test in a test instance is modified, it would have been marked somehow so it would be differentiated from the original test.

    2. In addition that an option to lock "update the original test", so he won't be able to easily update the original test.

    3. Give an option to change a test for a test set for all runs, in a way that it doesn't "call" the test but clones it while giving an option to edit it.

    3 votes
    Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    0 comments  ·  Admin →
    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
  13. 3 votes
    Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    0 comments  ·  Admin →
    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
  14. When a filter name is low on the page and you click on the menu icon next to it, it scrolls you to the top, causing you to have to scroll back down the page to the filter.

    4 votes
    Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
  15. Step names are not required within the tool and it is an extra hassle to have to include them when we import test cases from a spreadsheet. Could you make that a non-required field when importing?

    1 vote
    Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    0 comments  ·  Admin →
    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
  16. add an option to create, and modify a table in a test's description, expected results and actual results.

    and also to paste a table directly to any of these fields.

    6 votes
    Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
  17. In the tabular with steps report it is not possible to configure which fields to add to the issues tab, for example, priority.

    1 vote
    Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    0 comments  ·  Admin →
    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
  18. Add a way to select a bunch of tests then batch edit them to make a single change to a bunch of tests. That way, you don't have to go into 1 (of say 1000) tests just to modify the test with ONE word. So, if my tests name is Batch Production Phone Edit and I want to change it to Batch Production Phone Edit 1, Then Batch Production Phone Edit 2 etc. etc. I can just select each test and then batch edit to add the numbers to the end of the test title.

    3 votes
    Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    0 comments  ·  Admin →
    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
  19. I have a requirement to enable adding tests directly in test sets. Presently, when we try to add a test instance there, it shows just 2 columns. Test ID and Title. There is no way I can add more columns and resize the window.

    That's required when we want to create different test sets as per execution type, test level or as per area/application field(custom fields).

    Only way to do that now is create different filters as per the need in test library, get the tests and add them to the instances.
    Since in my one project, I have 5-6…

    1 vote
    Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    0 comments  ·  Admin →
    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
1 2 5 7 9 28 29
  • Don't see your idea?