Skip to content

General

General

Categories

564 results found

  1. In the tabular with steps report it is not possible to configure which fields to add to the issues tab, for example, priority.

    1 vote
    Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    0 comments  ·  Admin →
    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
  2. Add a way to select a bunch of tests then batch edit them to make a single change to a bunch of tests. That way, you don't have to go into 1 (of say 1000) tests just to modify the test with ONE word. So, if my tests name is Batch Production Phone Edit and I want to change it to Batch Production Phone Edit 1, Then Batch Production Phone Edit 2 etc. etc. I can just select each test and then batch edit to add the numbers to the end of the test title.

    3 votes
    Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    0 comments  ·  Admin →
    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
  3. I have a requirement to enable adding tests directly in test sets. Presently, when we try to add a test instance there, it shows just 2 columns. Test ID and Title. There is no way I can add more columns and resize the window.

    That's required when we want to create different test sets as per execution type, test level or as per area/application field(custom fields).

    Only way to do that now is create different filters as per the need in test library, get the tests and add them to the instances.
    Since in my one project, I have 5-6…

    1 vote
    Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    0 comments  ·  Admin →
    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
  4. This way we would not have to go back and edit the name of the test or the test set later.

    1 vote
    Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    0 comments  ·  Admin →
    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
  5. 1 vote
    Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    0 comments  ·  Admin →
    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
  6. We often add 10 or more test cases to each requirement which means having to click "Add" that number of times to link each test case. It would be nice if there was a way to add all of them at once.

    1 vote
    Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    0 comments  ·  Admin →
    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
  7. Implement a Test Planning Module. This module would be used for test planning purposes. It would be useful in the beginning of the planning stages before actual test cases can be written but planning information can be submitted. It can link to a group of Test Sets and show an entire plan for Testing. For example you would create a Test Plan for the "1.0 Upgrade Project" Within the plan you could have various Phases of Testing with Timelines projected. TestSet Phase 1 runs from Jan 1 - Mar 1 and contains the following Tests and testing resources. Phase 2…

    2 votes
    Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    1 comment  ·  Admin →
    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
  8. Currently the latest updates chart for dashboards only shows the last 5 items. Being able to show more than just the 5 latest updates would be useful to provide a better insight into what is being worked on inside dashboards.

    Adding a way for users to select an amount of updates to show would be a good solution, allowing people that only want to see 5 updates to still only see 5 but allowing others to see more if they wish to.

    1 vote
    Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    0 comments  ·  Admin →
    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
  9. 1 vote
    Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    0 comments  ·  Admin →
    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
  10. It shall be possible for us to see what step parameters have been used to run a test instance.
    Test instance grid only shows the last param value with which that test instance was run.
    Inside a test, we have multiple test instances, having information at one place makes it easy for us to review that team has covered all the possible test data

    1 vote
    Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    0 comments  ·  Admin →
    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
  11. Allow users to create a filter in the Test Sets & Runs module that will only show test sets with instances assigned to them.

    This way if a tester has been assigned multiple test instances across different test sets, he can see all of them at one shot instead of going through each test set to find what's allocated to him.

    3 votes
    Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
  12. Mostly custom fields would be used as step parameters. It would be great if we can allow cloning or sharing or copying custom fields to step parameters

    3 votes
    Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    0 comments  ·  Admin →
    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
  13. This should include:
    1. Company Logo
    2. Document title
    3. Date of issue
    4. Document ID number and Revision
    5. Number of pages (current page / Total number of pages)

    1 vote
    Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    0 comments  ·  Admin →
    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
  14. For auditing purposes would be nice to be able to download the screen shots or attachments for each test.

    This way i can send to the auditors during audit season

    3 votes
    Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
  15. We would like to have step parameters in the preconditions field as well.

    5 votes
    Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
  16. Custom Fields Customization missing edit value name (Linked List)

    This can be done for Link type but not for Linked List

    1 vote
    Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    0 comments  ·  Admin →
    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
  17. It would be nice to have the option to directly add attachments when creating an issue using the Jira integration.

    In our case issues created require a certain backup to be attached, right now testers always have to open the created issue in Jira afterwards to add this. This would be made easier if attachments could be uploaded directly when creating an issue from PractiTest.

    Possibly even uploading attachments from the test run as well to provide some more background information / possible ease of use.

    3 votes
    Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    0 comments  ·  Admin →
    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
  18. Implement Automatic Full Traceability - If I have a Req linked to a Test Case & I create an Issue that is linked to a Test Case, then the system should automatically link and show the Req & Issue linked. I should not have to manually link them.

    3 votes
    Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    0 comments  ·  Admin →
    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
  19. in the big project and data increasing, we noticed the API call limits stops developing and integrating with automation testing pipleline.

    It would be a great to run testing and updating issues if PractiTest support provision of batch API to avoiding limitation of API call (100 / 1 mins, and returned records )

    9 votes
    Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
  20. It would be very time saving being able to copy and paste step parameters across Test Instances in a TestSet.
    The current workaround is to write the parameters somewhere else, then bulk edit the Test Instances with the parameters to be pasted.

    Even better, a spreadsheet-like editor would solve this issue: one row per Test Instance, one column per parameter.

    3 votes
    Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    0 comments  ·  Admin →
    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
1 2 6 8 10 28 29
  • Don't see your idea?