603 results found

1. Extend Auto Filter to User Type of fields

   Auto Filter is a really interesting feature, but is today limited to the "List" type, and some other types may be usable for this, such as "User" Type
   I actually created a User Custom field (Reviewer) and it would be interesting to provide a filter to the different reviewers for their current list of review to do...

   It would be also interesting (but may be more complicated) to be able to generate Auto filter based on Cross Filter based on Auto filter...

   Again, we have a referent on the requirements, (User custom field), and we could create auto filter with this field if the first part of the suggestion is developed, but what could be interesting is to be able to display a list of test cases linked to requirements, based on the referent.

   Auto Filter is a really interesting feature, but is today limited to the "List" type, and some other types may be usable for this, such as "User" Type
   I actually created a User Custom field (Reviewer) and it would be interesting to provide a filter to the different reviewers for their current list of review to do...

   It would be also interesting (but may be more complicated) to be able to generate Auto filter based on Cross Filter based on Auto filter...

   Again, we have a referent on the requirements, (User custom field), and we could create auto filter with… more

   7 votes

   Vote Vote Vote

   Vote

   We're glad you're here

   Please sign in to leave feedback

   Signed in as (Sign out)

   Close

   Close

   1 vote 2 votes 3 votes Remove votes

   You have left! (?) (thinking…)
   0 comments  ·  Delete…  ·  Admin →
   How important is this to you?

   Not at all You must login first! Important You must login first! Critical You must login first!

   We're glad you're here

   Please sign in to leave feedback

   Signed in as (Sign out)

   Close

   Close

2. Add Ability to Convert Scripted Test into Exploratory

   It would help if users could convert Scripted Tests into Exploratory. We only started using Exploratory tests in the past year so if we could convert Scripted tests into exploratory that would help.

   4 votes

   Vote Vote Vote

   Vote

   We're glad you're here

   Please sign in to leave feedback

   Signed in as (Sign out)

   Close

   Close

   1 vote 2 votes 3 votes Remove votes

   You have left! (?) (thinking…)
   0 comments  ·  Delete…  ·  Admin →
   How important is this to you?

   Not at all You must login first! Important You must login first! Critical You must login first!

   We're glad you're here

   Please sign in to leave feedback

   Signed in as (Sign out)

   Close

   Close

3. Add the functionality for the list of pages to maintain the history of which page the user is currently on.

   When you are in a specific Test Case, which happens to be on a page which is not the beginning page (Page 1), and you back out of that Test Case, it is very frustrating to be sent back to the very front of the list of pages instead of backing out to the page of Test Cases you were on before selecting one to view. Example: If you are on page 4 in a list of 1000 Test Cases (display 100 Test Cases per page set) and had been looking at one particular Test Case and then back out, currently PractiTest sends you all the way back to the first page of the 10 pages instead of only back to page 4. Navigation needs to be reviewed and made more user friendly.

   When you are in a specific Test Case, which happens to be on a page which is not the beginning page (Page 1), and you back out of that Test Case, it is very frustrating to be sent back to the very front of the list of pages instead of backing out to the page of Test Cases you were on before selecting one to view. Example: If you are on page 4 in a list of 1000 Test Cases (display 100 Test Cases per page set) and had been looking at one particular Test Case and then back out,… more

   3 votes

   Vote Vote Vote

   Vote

   We're glad you're here

   Please sign in to leave feedback

   Signed in as (Sign out)

   Close

   Close

   1 vote 2 votes 3 votes Remove votes

   You have left! (?) (thinking…)
   0 comments  ·  Edit…  ·  Delete…  ·  Admin →
   How important is this to you?

   Not at all You must login first! Important You must login first! Critical You must login first!

   We're glad you're here

   Please sign in to leave feedback

   Signed in as (Sign out)

   Close

   Close

4. Add the arrow navigation controls for pages of Test Instances under Test Sets and Run to the bottom of the lists of Test Instances

   Add the navigation controls for pages of Test Instance under Test Sets and Run to the bottom of the lists of Test Instances...I am referring to the forward, backward, beginning of file and end of file arrows (that are almost missed being so small) which are next to the drop down for number of Test Instances shown on a page. It is frustrating to scroll to the bottom of a 100 Test Instance list and need to go to the next page only to have to scroll back to the top to access the controls to go to the next page.

   Add the navigation controls for pages of Test Instance under Test Sets and Run to the bottom of the lists of Test Instances...I am referring to the forward, backward, beginning of file and end of file arrows (that are almost missed being so small) which are next to the drop down for number of Test Instances shown on a page. It is frustrating to scroll to the bottom of a 100 Test Instance list and need to go to the next page only to have to scroll back to the top to access the controls to go to the next… more

   3 votes

   Vote Vote Vote

   Vote

   We're glad you're here

   Please sign in to leave feedback

   Signed in as (Sign out)

   Close

   Close

   1 vote 2 votes 3 votes Remove votes

   You have left! (?) (thinking…)
   0 comments  ·  Edit…  ·  Delete…  ·  Admin →
   How important is this to you?

   Not at all You must login first! Important You must login first! Critical You must login first!

   We're glad you're here

   Please sign in to leave feedback

   Signed in as (Sign out)

   Close

   Close

5. Allow the ability to search for a specific Test:ID number in the Search available in the Top Main Menu Bar.

   If you have a large number of tests in your Library and you are wanting to edit or revise a specific Test ID, it would be more efficient to allow the searching for the Test:ID rather than having to note details from the title of the test and search against that...easier and quicker to remember a number...

   3 votes

   Vote Vote Vote

   Vote

   We're glad you're here

   Please sign in to leave feedback

   Signed in as (Sign out)

   Close

   Close

   1 vote 2 votes 3 votes Remove votes

   You have left! (?) (thinking…)
   0 comments  ·  Delete…  ·  Admin →
   How important is this to you?

   Not at all You must login first! Important You must login first! Critical You must login first!

   We're glad you're here

   Please sign in to leave feedback

   Signed in as (Sign out)

   Close

   Close

6. Can we specify Test Results file with xBot script run?

   We have a field "Results Path" under Automation info tab while adding an xBot Test Case from PractiTest. Can we have a field to specify the Result file to upload during script run?

   3 votes

   Vote Vote Vote

   Vote

   We're glad you're here

   Please sign in to leave feedback

   Signed in as (Sign out)

   Close

   Close

   1 vote 2 votes 3 votes Remove votes

   You have left! (?) (thinking…)
   0 comments  ·  Edit…  ·  Delete…  ·  Admin →
   How important is this to you?

   Not at all You must login first! Important You must login first! Critical You must login first!

   We're glad you're here

   Please sign in to leave feedback

   Signed in as (Sign out)

   Close

   Close

7. Tables, Font sizes, inline attachments in Test cases description and test steps.

   The following issues/suggestions related to description and test steps of a testcase(test library, requirement & test set/test execution):

   1) In my organization we use JIRA and most of the stories contain data in tables with many rows and columns . When testcase( &requirement) is created from JIRA into PractiTest, data in table is displayed in between || in PractiTest. When the EYE icon in PractiTest, Table is not displayed. It will be great if we can at least display the data in table format when EYE icon is displayed.

   2) When we contacted Joel on the help chat, he showed us how to create a table using || and how to view the table using EYE icon in the PractiTest. But this is not at all useful in editing large tables(lots of rows and columns). It will be great if creating table is as easy as word/JIRA where the table borders are visible and also it will be great if editing can be possible with table borders still present. so we know which row/column date we are modifying

   3) Font size: As of now there is no easy way to increase or decrease the font size in test cases

   4) Attachments : It will be great if we have inline attachments. So we can refer to that particular attachment and describe the scenario.

   The following issues/suggestions related to description and test steps of a testcase(test library, requirement & test set/test execution):

   1) In my organization we use JIRA and most of the stories contain data in tables with many rows and columns . When testcase( &requirement) is created from JIRA into PractiTest, data in table is displayed in between || in PractiTest. When the EYE icon in PractiTest, Table is not displayed. It will be great if we can at least display the data in table format when EYE icon is displayed.

   2) When we contacted Joel on the help chat, he showed… more

   3 votes

   Vote Vote Vote

   Vote

   We're glad you're here

   Please sign in to leave feedback

   Signed in as (Sign out)

   Close

   Close

   1 vote 2 votes 3 votes Remove votes

   You have left! (?) (thinking…)
   0 comments  ·  Edit…  ·  Delete…  ·  Admin →
   How important is this to you?

   Not at all You must login first! Important You must login first! Critical You must login first!

   We're glad you're here

   Please sign in to leave feedback

   Signed in as (Sign out)

   Close

   Close

8. API instance run count

   For a particular Run Instance, I'd like to get number of runs for that instance.

   0 votes

   Vote Vote Vote

   Vote

   We're glad you're here

   Please sign in to leave feedback

   Signed in as (Sign out)

   Close

   Close

   1 vote 2 votes 3 votes Remove votes

   You have left! (?) (thinking…)
   0 comments  ·  Edit…  ·  Delete…  ·  Admin →
   How important is this to you?

   Not at all You must login first! Important You must login first! Critical You must login first!

   We're glad you're here

   Please sign in to leave feedback

   Signed in as (Sign out)

   Close

   Close

9. Calculate a field based on the values of other fields

   I am imagining the following to avoid using the green monster.

   Issue form with the following fields:
   • Reach (value dropdown 20)
   • Impact(value dropdown 0.5)
   • Confidence (value dropdown 100)
   • Estimate (value dropdown 10)
   • Score (calculation: 200.5100/10=100 from the above fields)

   6 votes

   Vote Vote Vote

   Vote

   We're glad you're here

   Please sign in to leave feedback

   Signed in as (Sign out)

   Close

   Close

   1 vote 2 votes 3 votes Remove votes

   You have left! (?) (thinking…)
   1 comment  ·  Delete…  ·  Admin →
   How important is this to you?

   Not at all You must login first! Important You must login first! Critical You must login first!

   We're glad you're here

   Please sign in to leave feedback

   Signed in as (Sign out)

   Close

   Close
   Ido Tandy responded

   
   

10. Provide Ability to Require Guide Points in Exploratory Testing

    When creating Exploratory Tests, we would like the ability to make Guide Points a required field. Sometimes users may only fill out the Test Charter when it would be beneficial to include Guide Points.

    1 vote

    Vote Vote Vote

    Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    Close

    Close

    1 vote 2 votes 3 votes Remove votes

    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    0 comments  ·  Edit…  ·  Delete…  ·  Admin →
    How important is this to you?

    Not at all You must login first! Important You must login first! Critical You must login first!

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    Close

    Close

11. Planned Execution Reminder

    Under a Test Set, one can set Planned Execution, I'd like to send out an email reminder for this planned execution with reminder options (week, 24 prior, or day of). Currently, we can get this from setting up a filter or report but it would be nice to have email reminders sent out to assigned.

    1 vote

    Vote Vote Vote

    Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    Close

    Close

    1 vote 2 votes 3 votes Remove votes

    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    0 comments  ·  Edit…  ·  Delete…  ·  Admin →
    How important is this to you?

    Not at all You must login first! Important You must login first! Critical You must login first!

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    Close

    Close

12. Forward Planning Dashboard capability

    Currently I am unable to forward planning the execution activities and display in the dashboards

    The dashboard only allows planning for the current date and dates in the past

    1 vote

    Vote Vote Vote

    Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    Close

    Close

    1 vote 2 votes 3 votes Remove votes

    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    0 comments  ·  Edit…  ·  Delete…  ·  Admin →
    How important is this to you?

    Not at all You must login first! Important You must login first! Critical You must login first!

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    Close

    Close

13. Ability to update the planned execution on the Instance

    The system should give the user the ability to update the planned execution on the Test Instance grid (Same functionality as the "Assigned To" field

    You can currently use the batch edit function but flexibility to use as per the Assigned To field would be much better

    Thanks Mike Siddall

    1 vote

    Vote Vote Vote

    Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    Close

    Close

    1 vote 2 votes 3 votes Remove votes

    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    0 comments  ·  Edit…  ·  Delete…  ·  Admin →
    How important is this to you?

    Not at all You must login first! Important You must login first! Critical You must login first!

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    Close

    Close

14. Dashboard - Requirements Progress Chart

    On the Dashboard, there's a Test Execution Progress chart. I'd also like to see something similar for Requirements.

    1 vote

    Vote Vote Vote

    Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    Close

    Close

    1 vote 2 votes 3 votes Remove votes

    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    0 comments  ·  Edit…  ·  Delete…  ·  Admin →
    How important is this to you?

    Not at all You must login first! Important You must login first! Critical You must login first!

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    Close

    Close

15. plan

    Implement a Test Planning Module. This module would be used for test planning purposes. It would be useful in the beginning of the planning stages before actual test cases can be written but planning information can be submitted. It can link to a group of Test Sets and show an entire plan for Testing. For example you would create a Test Plan for the "1.0 Upgrade Project" Within the plan you could have various Phases of Testing with Timelines projected. TestSet Phase 1 runs from Jan 1 - Mar 1 and contains the following Tests and testing resources. Phase 2 runs from Mar 2 - May 2 and contains the following tests and testing resources. Then you can show a dashboard or report containing the entire plan for the testing including scope of testing, phases, dates and testing resources.

    Implement a Test Planning Module. This module would be used for test planning purposes. It would be useful in the beginning of the planning stages before actual test cases can be written but planning information can be submitted. It can link to a group of Test Sets and show an entire plan for Testing. For example you would create a Test Plan for the "1.0 Upgrade Project" Within the plan you could have various Phases of Testing with Timelines projected. TestSet Phase 1 runs from Jan 1 - Mar 1 and contains the following Tests and testing resources. Phase 2… more

    2 votes

    Vote Vote Vote

    Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    Close

    Close

    1 vote 2 votes 3 votes Remove votes

    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    1 comment  ·  Delete…  ·  Admin →
    How important is this to you?

    Not at all You must login first! Important You must login first! Critical You must login first!

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    Close

    Close

16. Integrate steps parameters with FireCracker (and/or API)

    BDD automation has a feature call "Scenario Outline", where you can define a table data for the test. This feature is based in step parameters.
    PractiTest hosts also a step parameters feature, although the table data is defined at run time, unlike BDD automation, which is defined at test definition time
    This can be solved with a custom field hosting the table data, where automation framework can retrieve it using the API, but the problem is when we try to create a run.
    I have tried FireCracker with a Scenario Outline test and the report is not accurate because it does not match the parameter in the report with the parameter in the test.
    So, the new feature for PractiTest would be integrate steps parameters with FireCracker in order to go back to step definition and get its steps parameters and parse the step name in the report to act accordingly.

    Example:
    Test Library. Test. Steps
    Given an "anonymous" api consume
    When he asks for "{{page}}" page of "users"
    Then he gets a "SYNCHRONOUS_OK" response
    And the number of items per page matches response meta info
    And users response fields are populated

    Automation framework xml report file
    <testsuite name="As an anonymous api consumer I can get any page of users.As an anonymous api consumer I can get any page of users" tests="2" errors="0" failures="0" skipped="0" time="0.000933" timestamp="2021-01-27T13:05:22.684581" hostname="MacBook-Pro-13-Ton.local"><testcase classname="As an anonymous api consumer I can get any page of users.As an anonymous api consumer I can get any page of users" name="As an anonymous api consumer I can get any page of users. InstanceId=34428562 -- @1.1 " status="passed" time="0.000477"><system-out>
    <![CDATA[
    @scenario.begin
    Scenario Outline: As an anonymous api consumer I can get any page of users. InstanceId=34428562 -- @1.1
    Given an "anonymous" api consumer ... passed in 0.000s
    When he asks for "intermediate" page of "users" ... passed in 0.000s
    Then he gets a "SYNCHRONOUS_OK" response ... passed in 0.000s
    And the number of items per page matches response meta info ... passed in 0.000s
    And users response fields are populated ... passed in 0.000s

    @scenario.end

    ]]>
    </system-out></testcase><testcase classname="As an anonymous api consumer I can get any page of users.As an anonymous api consumer I can get any page of users" name="As an anonymous api consumer I can get any page of users. InstanceId=34428562 -- @1.2 " status="passed" time="0.000457"><system-out>
    <![CDATA[
    @scenario.begin
    Scenario Outline: As an anonymous api consumer I can get any page of users. InstanceId=34428562 -- @1.2
    Given an "anonymous" api consumer ... passed in 0.000s
    When he asks for "last" page of "users" ... passed in 0.000s
    Then he gets a "SYNCHRONOUS_OK" response ... passed in 0.000s
    And the number of items per page matches response meta info ... passed in 0.000s
    And users response fields are populated ... passed in 0.000s

    @scenario.end

    ]]>

    FireCracker should

    1.- Check
    When he asks for "last" page of "users" ... passed in 0.000s
    And
    When he asks for "{{page}}" page of "users"

    1. Get that "page" step parameter got "last" value

    2. Check
       When he asks for "intermediate" page of "users" ... passed in 0.000s
       And
       When he asks for "{{page}}" page of "users"

    3. Get that "page" step parameter got "intermediate" value

    BDD automation has a feature call "Scenario Outline", where you can define a table data for the test. This feature is based in step parameters.
    PractiTest hosts also a step parameters feature, although the table data is defined at run time, unlike BDD automation, which is defined at test definition time
    This can be solved with a custom field hosting the table data, where automation framework can retrieve it using the API, but the problem is when we try to create a run.
    I have tried FireCracker with a Scenario Outline test and the report is not accurate because it… more

    4 votes

    Vote Vote Vote

    Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    Close

    Close

    1 vote 2 votes 3 votes Remove votes

    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    0 comments  ·  Delete…  ·  Admin →
    How important is this to you?

    Not at all You must login first! Important You must login first! Critical You must login first!

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    Close

    Close

17. Reordering the tests in "Test Sets & Runs", without the need to go to "Reorder Instances". by holding CTRL or something like that
    4 votes

    Vote Vote Vote

    Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    Close

    Close

    1 vote 2 votes 3 votes Remove votes

    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    0 comments  ·  Delete…  ·  Admin →
    How important is this to you?

    Not at all You must login first! Important You must login first! Critical You must login first!

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    Close

    Close

18. add selected test by typing its number instead of searching for it in the list
    4 votes

    Vote Vote Vote

    Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    Close

    Close

    1 vote 2 votes 3 votes Remove votes

    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    0 comments  ·  Delete…  ·  Admin →
    How important is this to you?

    Not at all You must login first! Important You must login first! Critical You must login first!

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    Close

    Close

19. fix a bug with importing tests

    We continually get the same error when importing tests from an excel sheet. We fixed the author names to the current user, but continue to get the same error after trying to re-import the newly edited and saved file. This happens even when trying to login and import from a different browser and even when attempting it with a different user.

    1 vote

    Vote Vote Vote

    Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    Close

    Close

    1 vote 2 votes 3 votes Remove votes

    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    0 comments  ·  Edit…  ·  Delete…  ·  Admin →
    How important is this to you?

    Not at all You must login first! Important You must login first! Critical You must login first!

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    Close

    Close

20. Allow for creation of conditional test steps

    For example:
    Step 5: "Select the folder with today's date"
    
    - Condition: If folder does not exist, follow these steps (link to other steps, or insert in situ).
    
    If the folder does exist, have the ability to skip the does not exist condition.
    Sort of like an if-then-else statement inside a Test Case

    3 votes

    Vote Vote Vote

    Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    Close

    Close

    1 vote 2 votes 3 votes Remove votes

    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    0 comments  ·  Edit…  ·  Delete…  ·  Admin →
    How important is this to you?

    Not at all You must login first! Important You must login first! Critical You must login first!

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    Close

    Close