Skip to content

General

General

Categories

580 results found

  1. Currently we have to manually import the issue name and description and then Sync requirements and bug tracking issue.
    A function that creates a new TestSet with the name and description fields imported from YouTrack or another bug tracker and then automatically linked to the Requirement would be great for productivity and streamlining!

    3 votes
    Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    0 comments  ·  Admin →
    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
  2. For instances where you are uploading new test cases, it may be beneficial to have the ability to reference existing test cases, without the need to repeat these steps in the upload process. This may improve the maintainability of the Test Library.

    1 vote
    Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    0 comments  ·  Admin →
    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
  3. Allow custom user fields to be able to read from an external file. This should allow testing to be driven by the user data and hopefully increase the flexibility of the PractiTest.

    1 vote
    Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    0 comments  ·  Admin →
    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
  4. Remove the need to save in order to add attachments: "To add attachments to this step you need to save your test first."

    3 votes
    Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    0 comments  ·  Admin →
    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
  5. I'd like to see the ability to filter by last modified user. We have the ability to filter by last modified date, but I don't see a way to filter by last modified user.

    1 vote
    Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    0 comments  ·  Admin →
    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
  6. In consideration of the limitation of the number of calls that a user can make to the API, it would be wonderful if you could add support for the ability for a single API call to add multiple test cases into the test library with a single API call.

    11 votes
    Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    1 comment  ·  Admin →
    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
  7. add the ability to create a template to the issue creation fields, texts. It would be really great to make a better transparency of the informations in it. Decide what information would you like to use automatically ..etc

    1 vote
    Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    0 comments  ·  Admin →
    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
  8. Add the possibility to simply clone a step. for instance a 'clone step below' option that would copy/paste the test step fields and allows to edit them

    1 vote
    Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
  9. The idea is to be able to add custom modifications to the practitest configuration when using firecracker by using the XML properties in addition to current option by using XML attributes

    13 votes
    Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
  10. When doing a batch Edit I would like to be able to link the requirement in the edit functionality. That will help streamline the process of tracing backwards and forwards, making managing these projects easier!

    4 votes
    Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    1 comment  ·  Admin →
    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
  11. With the "Print" feature, we can print or create a pdf file of selected items like requirements.
    It would be nice if the attached images are included in the pdf, not a link or the name of the image.

    6 votes
    Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
  12. Currently, if you attempt to update a test case that is currently in the test library, there are some fields that will not update. For example, if one attempts to update the folllowing fields:

    "automated-test-info": {
    "automated-test-design": "updatedDataHere"
    }

    The API call returns a success, even though that data was never updated.

    3 votes
    Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    0 comments  ·  Admin →
    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
  13. When creating / editing a Test Library Filter, in the Custom Field area, I'd like to have Instance Count shown in the Filter View.

    3 votes
    Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    1 comment  ·  Admin →
    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
  14. 10 votes
    Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
  15. In PractiTest API, "Notification List" of "Issuse" cannot be read and set.
    Please take action to expand the scope of use of the PractiTest API.

    3 votes
    Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
  16. Auto Filter is a really interesting feature, but is today limited to the "List" type, and some other types may be usable for this, such as "User" Type
    I actually created a User Custom field (Reviewer) and it would be interesting to provide a filter to the different reviewers for their current list of review to do...

    It would be also interesting (but may be more complicated) to be able to generate Auto filter based on Cross Filter based on Auto filter...

    Again, we have a referent on the requirements, (User custom field), and we could create auto filter with…

    7 votes
    Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
  17. It would help if users could convert Scripted Tests into Exploratory. We only started using Exploratory tests in the past year so if we could convert Scripted tests into exploratory that would help.

    4 votes
    Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
  18. When you are in a specific Test Case, which happens to be on a page which is not the beginning page (Page 1), and you back out of that Test Case, it is very frustrating to be sent back to the very front of the list of pages instead of backing out to the page of Test Cases you were on before selecting one to view. Example: If you are on page 4 in a list of 1000 Test Cases (display 100 Test Cases per page set) and had been looking at one particular Test Case and then back out,…

    3 votes
    Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    0 comments  ·  Admin →
    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
  19. Add the navigation controls for pages of Test Instance under Test Sets and Run to the bottom of the lists of Test Instances...I am referring to the forward, backward, beginning of file and end of file arrows (that are almost missed being so small) which are next to the drop down for number of Test Instances shown on a page. It is frustrating to scroll to the bottom of a 100 Test Instance list and need to go to the next page only to have to scroll back to the top to access the controls to go to the next…

    3 votes
    Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    0 comments  ·  Admin →
    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
  20. If you have a large number of tests in your Library and you are wanting to edit or revise a specific Test ID, it would be more efficient to allow the searching for the Test:ID rather than having to note details from the title of the test and search against that...easier and quicker to remember a number...

    3 votes
    Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
1 2 8 10 12 28 29
  • Don't see your idea?