Skip to content

General

General

Categories

562 results found

  1. 1 vote
    Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    0 comments  ·  Admin →
    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
  2. To help improve the filtering within PractiTest there are some fields that we want to only capture in PT. To help with this we want to ability to include both Jira and PT fields on the bug raise screen. Currently we need to go manually update the fields once the bug has been raised.

    3 votes
    Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    0 comments  ·  Admin →
    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
  3. It would be better to see the changes in the test case history log when the test was updated by adding "+" (for addition) and "-" (for removal) signs in front of each change

    24 votes
    Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
  4. At a glance it's difficult for devs, PMs, or other users not in Practitest itself but using Jira integration to tell if a test case has failed because of something new to the ticket, or something already in the system. Some mark or color differentiation would be valuable in sorting the two.

    3 votes
    Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    0 comments  ·  Admin →
    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
  5. Auto Filters are a great idea, however, the default name limits their usage.
    I know that the Auto Filter is unique on the same level of the hierarchy, yet, I want to let my Test Managers decide how to name them.

    Plus, there might be a confusing situation in which someone creates an Auto Filter and makes it private - then another user cannot create such Auto Filter at all and gets a "name is already taken" message, which is confusing.

    16 votes
    Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    1 comment  ·  Admin →
    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
  6. I know there are many keyboard shortcuts available already, but there is always a place for something new :)

    For example, there is a shortcut for a Search field, but only for the "search by keyword" one, the global search.
    How about adding a shortcut for a "search by ID" field?

    1 vote
    Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    0 comments  ·  Admin →
    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
  7. I have team members who should have access to reports and can download/re-generate them at any time, but I do not want them to change anything.
    Currently, the permission checkbox for reports in the user group says: "View, Create, Edit and Delete Reports".

    I think there should be 2 checkboxes:
    One just says "View Reports"
    Another says "View, Create, Edit and Delete Reports"

    3 votes
    Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    0 comments  ·  Admin →
    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
  8. Can you please revert the UI back to an old view? Or reduce blue colors. My eyes are burning after couple hours of staring at it.

    1 vote
    Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    0 comments  ·  Admin →
    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
  9. We have more than 40 projects in our account and it's quite cumbersome to choose the project I need to clone from the list of projects without any order.

    Either:
    - add an option to start typing a project name and it will appear;
    - sort the project alphabetically.

    Please!

    3 votes
    Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    0 comments  ·  Admin →
    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
  10. Compatible version of PractiTest for JIRA - Test Management(3.0.13) for Jira 9.4.1 version.

    Hi Team, We recently upgraded our Jira instance to 9.4.1 but the PractiTest for JIRA - Test Management is not Compatible with the newer version of Jira.
    Many users are not able to use/link the issues from pactitest to Jira. The integration is stopped working.

    if we try to open the configure button on Jira manage apps page its showing below error


    HTTP Status 405 – Method Not Allowed
    Type Status Report

    Description The method received in the request-line is known by the origin server but not…

    3 votes
    Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    0 comments  ·  Admin →
    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
  11. 3 votes
    Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    0 comments  ·  Admin →
    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
  12. Expand traceability in Requiremnets to include Linked Requirements., This will enable association between Business Requirements to Functional Requirements etc.

    Also supports a heirachy of requirements (drill down).

    It appears that the change would be relatively simple given the existing Traceability functions in Requirements for Linked Tests and Linked Issues. Just add Linked Requirements.

    1 vote
    Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    0 comments  ·  Admin →
    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
  13. I want to have the ability to create dedicated Task Board tabs - just like we have dashboards now.

    1 vote
    Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    0 comments  ·  Admin →
    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
  14. When we sync Jira issue to Practitest - whether it's going to be an issue, or a requirement - we can only see which type it is in Jira in Description field.
    If we could map it to custom field in Practitest, it will help us organizing them in Practitest per issue types, for example, with Filters.

    For example, we sync both Stories and Epics as Requirements, I want to build a filter (autofilter for example) which shows which Requirements are Stories and which are Epics.

    6 votes
    Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    1 comment  ·  Admin →
    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
  15. When I enter a keyword and search, many test cases with the keyword will not show.
    Now just crtl+F for every page and it is miserable...

    9 votes
    Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
  16. I have two suggestions about the use of Linked Lists in filters:

    Suggestion 1. If I use a parent list in the criterion, the criterion of a linked list should show me only the values that are related to the parent list value.
    For example, I have two fields
    Feature - values A, B
    Sub Feature - values (A) 1,2 ; (B) 3,4
    If my first criterion is "Feature is A", and I start to create criteria "Sub Feature is..", then the dropdown list should show me only values 1,2. Currently it shows 1,2,3,4

    Suggestion 2: If I use the…

    18 votes
    Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
  17. I worked with Robot Framework and create a plugin for report tests into PractiTest
    For the robot, precondition flow is an important part of the test, so such an option makes PractiTEst tests created from the robot more sense fully

    2 votes
    Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
  18. people use sheet why?
    fast
    easy to modify
    give concise view
    easy to update.

    test set with permutation and combination should be in same way as google sheet.

    main test as column and test data as row heading

    3 votes
    Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    0 comments  ·  Admin →
    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
  19. 1 vote
    Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    0 comments  ·  Admin →
    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
  20. The current response given for too many requests is :

    {"errors":[{"status":429,"title":"Exceeded API rate limit of 30 per 60 seconds","Retry-After":"60 seconds"}]}

    what would be useful if the key "Retry-After" gave you the amount of seconds required before retry and was just a number not a string. It appears it just gives you 60 seconds regardless of how long you've been in API jail.

    either that or add a new key entirely for this purpose (probably would make change control easier to add a new key)

    currently when im looping and uploading im having to work this out myself. Though i'm having…

    3 votes
    Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    0 comments  ·  Admin →
    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
  • Don't see your idea?