556 results found

1. Add support to fetch child filter summary in main filter api

   Like I have filter1 and filter2, filter3 as a child filter of filter 1. If we can give a summary of filter2 and filter3 in filter1 API request.

   1 vote

   Vote 0 votes Vote Vote

   Vote

   We're glad you're here

   Please sign in to leave feedback

   Signed in as (Sign out)

   Close

   Close

   1 vote 2 votes 3 votes Remove votes

   You have left! (?) (thinking…)
   0 comments  ·  Edit…  ·  Delete…  ·  Admin →
   How important is this to you?

   Not at all You must login first! Important You must login first! Critical You must login first!

   We're glad you're here

   Please sign in to leave feedback

   Signed in as (Sign out)

   Close

   Close

   Submit Rating

2. Should increase Pie Charts capacity in the same tab

   We use a tab for each version and there, we have a pie chart for each build from that version.
   At this moment, only 8 pie charts can be created in a tab.

   We would like to be able to add more Pie Charts, for better visibility of all builds from that version.

   Currently, we can either delete old build pie charts or create a second tab for the same version, both which are not good solutions. After each version, we send a report with all builds from that version and a guest link for stakeholders to see the progress, it's confusing for them to have multiple links to see the overall status of a version.

   We use a tab for each version and there, we have a pie chart for each build from that version.
   At this moment, only 8 pie charts can be created in a tab.

   We would like to be able to add more Pie Charts, for better visibility of all builds from that version.

   Currently, we can either delete old build pie charts or create a second tab for the same version, both which are not good solutions. After each version, we send a report with all builds from that version and a guest link for stakeholders to see the progress,… more

   1 vote

   Vote 0 votes Vote Vote

   Vote

   We're glad you're here

   Please sign in to leave feedback

   Signed in as (Sign out)

   Close

   Close

   1 vote 2 votes 3 votes Remove votes

   You have left! (?) (thinking…)
   planned  ·  0 comments  ·  Delete…  ·  Admin →
   How important is this to you?

   Not at all You must login first! Important You must login first! Critical You must login first!

   We're glad you're here

   Please sign in to leave feedback

   Signed in as (Sign out)

   Close

   Close

   Submit Rating

3. Should increase Pie Charts capacity in the same tab

   We use a tab for each version and there, we have a pie chart for each build from that version.
   At this moment, only 8 pie charts can be created in a tab.

   We would like to be able to add more Pie Charts, for better visibility of all builds from that version.

   Currently, we can either delete old build pie charts or create a second tab for the same version, both which are not good solutions. After each version, we send a report with all builds from that version and a guest link for stakeholders to see the progress, it's confusing for them to have multiple links to see the overall status of a version.

   We use a tab for each version and there, we have a pie chart for each build from that version.
   At this moment, only 8 pie charts can be created in a tab.

   We would like to be able to add more Pie Charts, for better visibility of all builds from that version.

   Currently, we can either delete old build pie charts or create a second tab for the same version, both which are not good solutions. After each version, we send a report with all builds from that version and a guest link for stakeholders to see the progress,… more

   3 votes

   Vote 0 votes Vote Vote

   Vote

   We're glad you're here

   Please sign in to leave feedback

   Signed in as (Sign out)

   Close

   Close

   1 vote 2 votes 3 votes Remove votes

   You have left! (?) (thinking…)
   planned  ·  0 comments  ·  Delete…  ·  Admin →
   How important is this to you?

   Not at all You must login first! Important You must login first! Critical You must login first!

   We're glad you're here

   Please sign in to leave feedback

   Signed in as (Sign out)

   Close

   Close

   Submit Rating

4. When filter with date type field, user can select today() instead of select specific date on calendar.

   I need to create a filter to collect all test result older than 4 days. Tried to filter with Last Run field but I can't see suitable operator. It must be good if we can use today() instead of select specific date on calendar or there is operator such as: Before the last X days...

   6 votes

   Vote 0 votes Vote Vote

   Vote

   We're glad you're here

   Please sign in to leave feedback

   Signed in as (Sign out)

   Close

   Close

   1 vote 2 votes 3 votes Remove votes

   You have left! (?) (thinking…)
   0 comments  ·  Delete…  ·  Admin →
   How important is this to you?

   Not at all You must login first! Important You must login first! Critical You must login first!

   We're glad you're here

   Please sign in to leave feedback

   Signed in as (Sign out)

   Close

   Close

   Submit Rating

5. Multiple selection on requirements

   When you select the traceability of a requirement you can only add one test at a time, can we have a multiple selection like the add instances on a test run?

   3 votes

   Vote 0 votes Vote Vote

   Vote

   We're glad you're here

   Please sign in to leave feedback

   Signed in as (Sign out)

   Close

   Close

   1 vote 2 votes 3 votes Remove votes

   You have left! (?) (thinking…)
   0 comments  ·  Delete…  ·  Admin →
   How important is this to you?

   Not at all You must login first! Important You must login first! Critical You must login first!

   We're glad you're here

   Please sign in to leave feedback

   Signed in as (Sign out)

   Close

   Close

   Submit Rating
   Ido Tandy responded

6. Upload a screenshot simply by pasting it to the step screen / upload screen

   This will make this process more productive and easy.
   
   Same as you do in JIRA tickets - pasting a screenshot from clipboard within the create screen, automatically uploads it to the ticket.

   10 votes

   Vote 0 votes Vote Vote

   Vote

   We're glad you're here

   Please sign in to leave feedback

   Signed in as (Sign out)

   Close

   Close

   1 vote 2 votes 3 votes Remove votes

   You have left! (?) (thinking…)
   1 comment  ·  Delete…  ·  Admin →
   How important is this to you?

   Not at all You must login first! Important You must login first! Critical You must login first!

   We're glad you're here

   Please sign in to leave feedback

   Signed in as (Sign out)

   Close

   Close

   Submit Rating

7. Ability to expand a Requirement in the Filter Grid

   It would be helpful to be able to expand a requirement from the filter view. Currently, you can see the ID, Name, Status and Actions fields (for All Requirements filter). To see the requirement description or any of the custom fields, you need to click the requirement name and be directed to another screen. Being able to expand the requirement from the filter grid would make navigation easier and allow the user to view multiple requirements simultaneously. This would be a game changer for us.

   1 vote

   Vote 0 votes Vote Vote

   Vote

   We're glad you're here

   Please sign in to leave feedback

   Signed in as (Sign out)

   Close

   Close

   1 vote 2 votes 3 votes Remove votes

   You have left! (?) (thinking…)
   0 comments  ·  Edit…  ·  Delete…  ·  Admin →
   How important is this to you?

   Not at all You must login first! Important You must login first! Critical You must login first!

   We're glad you're here

   Please sign in to leave feedback

   Signed in as (Sign out)

   Close

   Close

   Submit Rating

8. Control access of testers for changing field values
   3 votes

   Vote 0 votes Vote Vote

   Vote

   We're glad you're here

   Please sign in to leave feedback

   Signed in as (Sign out)

   Close

   Close

   1 vote 2 votes 3 votes Remove votes

   You have left! (?) (thinking…)
   0 comments  ·  Edit…  ·  Delete…  ·  Admin →
   How important is this to you?

   Not at all You must login first! Important You must login first! Critical You must login first!

   We're glad you're here

   Please sign in to leave feedback

   Signed in as (Sign out)

   Close

   Close

   Submit Rating

9. Control access of testers for changing field values
   1 vote

   Vote 0 votes Vote Vote

   Vote

   We're glad you're here

   Please sign in to leave feedback

   Signed in as (Sign out)

   Close

   Close

   1 vote 2 votes 3 votes Remove votes

   You have left! (?) (thinking…)
   0 comments  ·  Edit…  ·  Delete…  ·  Admin →
   How important is this to you?

   Not at all You must login first! Important You must login first! Critical You must login first!

   We're glad you're here

   Please sign in to leave feedback

   Signed in as (Sign out)

   Close

   Close

   Submit Rating

10. ability to add issue: fields to an instance report.

    ability to add issue: fields to an instance report.

    1 vote

    Vote 0 votes Vote Vote

    Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    Close

    Close

    1 vote 2 votes 3 votes Remove votes

    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    0 comments  ·  Edit…  ·  Delete…  ·  Admin →
    How important is this to you?

    Not at all You must login first! Important You must login first! Critical You must login first!

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    Close

    Close

    Submit Rating

11. Allow historical users to remain in a users list field

    If you have a custom field that uses the user list; only current users on a project are available. If that field needs to be set after the user has been removed from project, they are no longer available as a selection item.

    1 vote

    Vote 0 votes Vote Vote

    Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    Close

    Close

    1 vote 2 votes 3 votes Remove votes

    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    0 comments  ·  Edit…  ·  Delete…  ·  Admin →
    How important is this to you?

    Not at all You must login first! Important You must login first! Critical You must login first!

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    Close

    Close

    Submit Rating

12. Linked List Add New Item in drop down

    Allow addition of new items to a linked list child list from the form drop down. This feature was added to regular lists a while ago and is much more convenient then modifying the list contents in the fields settings section.

    1 vote

    Vote 0 votes Vote Vote

    Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    Close

    Close

    1 vote 2 votes 3 votes Remove votes

    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    under review  ·  0 comments  ·  Delete…  ·  Admin →
    How important is this to you?

    Not at all You must login first! Important You must login first! Critical You must login first!

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    Close

    Close

    Submit Rating

13. Reorder Test Cases in Test Library & preserve the same order when generating the reports.

    The user should able to reorder the Test Cases for a project in the Test Library.

    My requirement:
    I have 3 tests,
    Test 1, Test 2, Test 3

    They are created in some order say, Test 1, Test 2 , & then Test 3,

    But my Test 3 is the continuation of Test 1, what I actually meant is Test 3 will start from where I ended in Test 1.

    So, I want my tests to be in the below order:

    Test 1
    Test 3
    Test 2

    I tried several ways to reorder the tests but nothing worked.

    Some of the ways I tried were:
    Sorting by Name
    Prefix with Alphabet (this does not work if the tests are more than A to Z)
    Prefix with Number (did not work)

    For my problem, the apt solution is to provide a feature similar to ‘Reorder Instances’ in the Test Sets & Runs page.

    Also, I want the same order to be preserved when I generate the Reports. So, while configuring the reports, the user should be provided a option to preserve the objects order as it is in the test or testset or instance or issues or requirements.

    I am surprised as to why this already existing(reordering) functionality n the Test Sets & Runs page is not implemented in Test Library page.

    I guess, these functionalities on the Test Library page & reports generation will help a lot to the PractiTest community.

    The user should able to reorder the Test Cases for a project in the Test Library.

    My requirement:
    I have 3 tests,
    Test 1, Test 2, Test 3

    They are created in some order say, Test 1, Test 2 , & then Test 3,

    But my Test 3 is the continuation of Test 1, what I actually meant is Test 3 will start from where I ended in Test 1.

    So, I want my tests to be in the below order:

    Test 1
    Test 3
    Test 2

    I tried several ways to reorder the tests but nothing worked.

    Some of… more

    12 votes

    Vote 0 votes Vote Vote

    Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    Close

    Close

    1 vote 2 votes 3 votes Remove votes

    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    3 comments  ·  Delete…  ·  Admin →
    How important is this to you?

    Not at all You must login first! Important You must login first! Critical You must login first!

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    Close

    Close

    Submit Rating

14. I would like there to be a way to batch delete the tests from multiple testsets

    I would like to have the option to batch delete all the tests within multiple TestSets. Alternatively, if I clone multiple TestSets, I should have the option to delete the tests within the new cloned TestSets

    1 vote

    Vote 0 votes Vote Vote

    Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    Close

    Close

    1 vote 2 votes 3 votes Remove votes

    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    0 comments  ·  Edit…  ·  Delete…  ·  Admin →
    How important is this to you?

    Not at all You must login first! Important You must login first! Critical You must login first!

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    Close

    Close

    Submit Rating

15. link requirement to requirement

    Ability to link a requirement to another. This can be another option in Traceability tab where we currently link tests and issues.

    7 votes

    Vote 0 votes Vote Vote

    Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    Close

    Close

    1 vote 2 votes 3 votes Remove votes

    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    under review  ·  1 comment  ·  Delete…  ·  Admin →
    How important is this to you?

    Not at all You must login first! Important You must login first! Critical You must login first!

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    Close

    Close

    Submit Rating

16. Ability to sync the comments from requirements and bugs from ADO to PractiTest and vice versa

    Currently when the requirements and bugs are synced from ADO, the comments are not synced.

    For requirements the comments have valuable information reflecting the changes and doubts which are important for a tester to know while creating test cases so it is very critical to include the comments as well.Also if a tester has certain doubts on a requirements if there is a 2 way sync he can just post the comments on the PractiTest and they should flow to the linked requirement card in the ADO.

    For bugs, since the developers won't always have access to PractiTest, the will post the comments around fix and status on the ADO comments. So it is critical for the comments to flow from ADO to PRactiTest. Also when the tester finishes testing the bug he should have ability to post his findings in the practiTest and the 2 way sync should put those comments back to the bug in the ADO. Also the tester may have further clearifications to seek from developer so he should be able to post the comment in PractiTest and it should flow thru to ADO linked bug card.

    Currently when the requirements and bugs are synced from ADO, the comments are not synced.

    For requirements the comments have valuable information reflecting the changes and doubts which are important for a tester to know while creating test cases so it is very critical to include the comments as well.Also if a tester has certain doubts on a requirements if there is a 2 way sync he can just post the comments on the PractiTest and they should flow to the linked requirement card in the ADO.

    For bugs, since the developers won't always have access to PractiTest, the will… more

    31 votes

    Vote 0 votes Vote Vote

    Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    Close

    Close

    1 vote 2 votes 3 votes Remove votes

    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    planned  ·  0 comments  ·  Delete…  ·  Admin →
    How important is this to you?

    Not at all You must login first! Important You must login first! Critical You must login first!

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    Close

    Close

    Submit Rating

17. create a way to filter/report on issue status history

    I am looking for an easy way to report on the status history of an issue. As it is now, I can only easily filter on current status when I create reports/filters. I am looking for a way to find issues that were ever in rejected status or were at one time set to "reopened" without having to manually read the history of every issue.

    1 vote

    Vote 0 votes Vote Vote

    Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    Close

    Close

    1 vote 2 votes 3 votes Remove votes

    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    0 comments  ·  Edit…  ·  Delete…  ·  Admin →
    How important is this to you?

    Not at all You must login first! Important You must login first! Critical You must login first!

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    Close

    Close

    Submit Rating

18. Task Board - Customize with chosen fields

    I would appreciate to be able to choose the fields shown for all tasks. For exemple, to be able to see the Priority or other chosen fields.

    10 votes

    Vote 0 votes Vote Vote

    Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    Close

    Close

    1 vote 2 votes 3 votes Remove votes

    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    0 comments  ·  Delete…  ·  Admin →
    How important is this to you?

    Not at all You must login first! Important You must login first! Critical You must login first!

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    Close

    Close

    Submit Rating

19. Only display step information that failed when creating a bug using JIRA integration , do not include all steps

    When creating a bug using JIRA integration currently all steps in the test are pased into the jira description. It would make more sense to only paste the step that failed and the results from that step. this would give the user the information on the actual issue and reduce the amount of editing currently required using jira integration

    3 votes

    Vote 0 votes Vote Vote

    Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    Close

    Close

    1 vote 2 votes 3 votes Remove votes

    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    0 comments  ·  Edit…  ·  Delete…  ·  Admin →
    How important is this to you?

    Not at all You must login first! Important You must login first! Critical You must login first!

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    Close

    Close

    Submit Rating

20. Add the ability to import Exploratory tests
    9 votes

    Vote 0 votes Vote Vote

    Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    Close

    Close

    1 vote 2 votes 3 votes Remove votes

    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    waiting for supporters  ·  1 comment  ·  Delete…  ·  Admin →
    How important is this to you?

    Not at all You must login first! Important You must login first! Critical You must login first!

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    Close

    Close

    Submit Rating