603 results found
-
We would love the ability to run cURL commands form within Practitest so that we can launch our automation from within a test run.
We would love the ability to run cURL commands form within Practitest so that we can launch our automation from within a test run.
3 votes -
Update the call on issue creation in YouTrack synchronization
PractiTest supports a synchronization with YouTrack, especially for the bug creation (from PractiTest to YouTrack).
There is currently no way to change the call on PractiTest test side.
YouTrack proposes a feature to update object on Event, such as issue creation.
I would need to identify that the issue is coming from PractiTest, and then I would be able to make my change on YouTrack side.The signature includes 2 fields, which are not filled today: externalId and externalUrl, which shall be filled in my opinion when the issue is created from an external tool.
Could you please fill at…
3 votes -
Improvements to Exploratory testing
When using Exploratory testing can we have an option to:
(1) Take screen shot and add comments via the tool itself
(2) record all the screen actions as a recording.
(3) Convert all the actions automatically as steps if you want to make the test a scripted one for later use26 votes -
Email notification to cover the changes done at Step description and expected result level
Currently, test modification email notification does not inform the Test admin about the exact changes done at step description and step expected result. This is must needed request . Even Project history does not keep the record of test modification at the level of Steps description and Step expected result
3 votes -
Different types of parameters
Currently we are running into a wall with re-usability. Either we don't use parameters,and there's no re-usability and alot of cloned code for one single functionality, or we use parameters and every test with "Call steps from another test" will have to set up all the parameters on test set run.
I propose a way to set parameter values on a test level. So when we use "Call steps from another test", all the parameters for that called test are possible to be set from within the current test, allowing for a lot more re-usability within tests. Not all should…
5 votes -
Improvements to syncing requirements or bugs from Jira or ADO
When a project is integrated with a project board in JIRA or in future ADO, can we please make sure :
(1) All the requirements flow thru automatically without a manual need to do it
(2) The syncing of the requirements is automatically done periodically.
(3) The issues raised in the Jira or ADO should sync automatically.26 votes -
Add descriptions to the fields (custom or System)
When we create custom fields or modify a System field, it would be great to add a Description that we could then view as a tool tip in the entity. This would give more context around the importance or purpose of the field and would give testers a more compelling reason for filling it in.
Right now, we document the purpose and description of each of the fields and filters we have set up in a wiki page. It would be nice to be able to manage this directly from PractiTest.
1 vote -
Request for New Features in Jira View and Integration?
Hello, Can we request to remove text " PractiTest: Linked Results (Runs)" from the view of the main screen and omit from issue type which are not integrated in setting of the project ? We just want to see it on the right pane which is ok
Is there any possibility to add this feature?
Thanks,
Faisal1 vote -
Link an issue to a test case via API
While creation of an issue via API, I would like to link it to a test case which failed.
1 vote -
user group
Alphabetize user names in groups. Searching for a particular user would be much easier.
1 vote -
Give users the ability to add custom fields at Test Step Level.
You should give the users to add fields at test step level.
They should be allowed to Add things like Test Data for a particular step like Large Queries it it. For us the Test Precondition or Test Description or Test Name cannot be used for that purpose.
13 votes -
Permutation of a test set
While creating a Permutation of a test set, after selecting all the field values of the new permutation and clicking on the Next button. On the next page, I get a list of all permutations which can only be selected but not editable. It will be good if the user can also edit it and give a Test Set name whatever suits. Because this feature is not available currently, I have to create the Test Set first and then edit it to change the test set name which suits my requirements.
6 votes -
Add the ability to the boutton «Click here to create a new Requirement / test»
Add the ability to «Click here to create a new Requirement / test»:
It's possible to create a new Requirement or test with the relevant value in the fields automatically if we create it from the boutton «Click here to create a new Requirement / test». And it's possible to always keep the button «Click here to create a new Requirement / test» at the top of each filter page ?9 votes -
Add filters to Dashboard so user can create dashboards based on their queries or filters
Like I want quarter wise data or team-wise data I have to create a report for that instead of that if you can give that functionality in the dashboard that will be very helpful.
4 votes -
Upload requirement multiple times without duplicating
Ability to upload requirement without duplicating, but the changes in the new upload are made on the requirement. History is captured to track what changed, when, how and by whom.
1 vote -
Real time integration with Jira
In integration with Jira, any story created in jira has to be explicitly imported to PT. You can give user an option to enable real-time integration with JIra, which means, when a new user story in created in Jira, it is automatically imported to PT in requirements module.
4 votes -
Test Protocol Print Report
We would like the ability to print out empty test sets so that we may route them for review and approval. This report would print out the test set with each test case and their steps in a similar format to a detailed instance report (without the need of creating individual runs for each instance and leaving them blank).
An alternative would be to have a way to batch create runs for test instances so that we may use existing reports to print out our Test Protocol.
1 vote -
Add Test Data field to Test Run similar to Preconditions for the Test
Similar to Preconditions in Test Run, add a field Test Data that shows up while running a test
3 votes -
Remove blank columns & rows from detailed report (Excel)
When Practitest generates a 'detail' report of tests, in Excel format, there are two blank columns on the left (A & B) and a lot of blank rows padding the report. These blanks waste space on the screen/ sheet when printing. I have to manually remove these every time, which wastes time. Please could you take them out of the default report ?
8 votes -
customizable test progression graph in the dashboard
The test execution progress graph is a real good tool, giving clear info on a project progress status.
For now the time period of this graph is fixed to 28 days.
Being able to customize this X-axe would be very useful to study the reasons of slowliness in a project afterwards, for instance.8 votes
- Don't see your idea?