549 results found
-
Better test step UI for running and editing test cases
Step result - Rather than just change the colour of the step name/heading, which gets lost in the links and other text above/below it, shade whole the step area/row.
If step N has a result provided (pass, fail, block), and all the steps between step 0 and step N are blank, set steps ) to N all to Pass. This will reduce the number of clicks a tester has to do in order to work through running a test case.
Allow a step to be flagged as "needing review" while the test is being run so it can be completed…
3 votes -
Field data set on 1 screen and showing back on other screens
For example:
I have 1 Custom field browser (list) that have some values in it (Chrome, Firefox Safari etc.)
I set that custom field on the screen:
- Test
- Instance
- IssueWhen I Create new Test and I set the Browser: Firefox when im done with the Test --> Il Create TestSet & Instance = When im in the instance screen I see the Custom field Browser thats already filled in with 'Firefox' that I have selected in the screen Test.
Start the instance and there is a Issue --> Create an Issue, Open the Issue screen and…
3 votes -
Not auto-enable bookmark panel in PDF reports....
Since there are no bookmarks created in the PDF versions of PactiTest reports anyway.
1 vote -
Add date-based and "show most recent only" filter options to "Instance" report types.
It would be very helpful to have a report shat shows only the most recently run test instance and exclude the older test instances for the applicable filter.
3 votes -
1 vote
-
Filters by users which are no longer part of this project
Filters by users which are no longer part of this project
7 votes -
Option to remove 'title' field for every test step
Although a small issue, this becomes irritating when we are creating or importing dozens of test cases.
The 'step title' field (it doesn't actually have a name) adds an extra step which seems unnecessary. In my experience it is rare to need to title each and every test step. Please could you have the more standard Description-Expected Result only format when creating test steps?5 votes -
Add defect search functionality to Add Existing Issue to Test flow
When linking a defect to an executed (failed) test, you do not always remember the defect ID. This is an annoying way to currently link defects.
On the link existing issue step, it would help greatly if we could bring up a list of all defects and be able to sort and search them by date/title/description.8 votes -
Add status for users in user setup
In current version the basis for access and invoicing is users defined in the user setup. In a project when testers are involved now and then, the administrator must manually remove the users to have control of the costs. When the users is supposed to do testing activities later, the admin must then manually add all users. This is very time consuming in big projects. However, it should be possible to set a user inactive by changing a status that will prevent the user from having access to the project and also will exclude this user from the payment.
4 votes -
Copy/Link attachment from test result while generating an issue
Now you have to upload an attachment twice when there are issues to raise. It would be handy if an attachment can be linked or copied to the issue.
10 votes -
Improve functionality of editing and updating tests from runs
I find the current functionality of updating your test while executing it a bit clunky. Now I do understand that it is meant for small changes where big test overhauls should only be done in the test Steps tab but still I think there are some improvements to be made.
1) If a step has been edited during a run, PT should ask the user if he wishes to 'Update Original test' before navigating away from the page. I find that I often update a step but forget to click the button to update the test at the end.
2)…4 votes -
API to the DB, so we can run queries directly to the DB
It can be used to run any report that multiple DB insertions that are not currently supported
6 votes -
make dashboard update upon opening.
I corrected a spelling mistake on a filter name. Re-opened Dashboard and found spelling mistake still visible. It only displayed the corrected view after I manually re-freshed Dashboard, I think there is an assumption that when you open Dashboard it will be up to date with current information not on be part way through a 15 minute cycle of updates.
1 vote -
Create an option in the report center sector for generating a report with our companies logo as default at the right top corner
So when i go to the Report Center that it will be possible to upload our logo in a report.
6 votes -
1 vote
-
Option to cascade view in filters
add option to cascade a view of a parent field to all of its children
1 vote -
Conditional Mandatory Fields - If I have a field that is value X, then make one or two ther fields mandatory to fill in (or select).
Conditional Mandatory Fields - If I have a field that is value X, then make one or two the selected fields mandatory to fill in (or select). If value is not X then either grey out the fields or make the other one or two fields not required.
18 votes -
Able to create a single dashboard across mutiple projects
Would like to have a single dashboard that can cover multiple projects. As a manager of projects this would be highly benefitcial.
17 votes -
1 vote
-
Improve Fogbugz Integration (Push data to and from Pracitest)
(1) link test cases to externally stored requirements (In fogbugz) and push the externally stored requirement data into Practitest requirements for reporting/dashboard.
(2) Add a Push link next to the Defects field in the Test Run Result screen which pushes a bug report to the external system (FogBugz) without leaving Practitest and make a copy in 'Issues' at the same time for reporting/dashboard.
(3) Hyperlinks to externally held data if only linking to issues/requirements in the external system and not pushing data to and fro (hovering the mouse cursor over a fogbugz case ID in either issues or requirements screen…3 votes
- Don't see your idea?