AdminChristine (Admin, PractiTest)

My feedback

  1. 1 vote
    Vote
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: facebook google
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    0 comments  ·  General  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    AdminChristine (Admin, PractiTest) shared this idea  · 
  2. 1 vote
    Vote
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: facebook google
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    0 comments  ·  General  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    AdminChristine (Admin, PractiTest) shared this idea  · 
  3. 10 votes
    Vote
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: facebook google
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    planned  ·  4 comments  ·  General  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    AdminChristine (Admin, PractiTest) commented  · 

    Hi,

    KIndly note that this feature was already planned and once we replace the Test Instances grid, we will completely resolve this problem.

    In the meantime we wanted to update you that we enlarged the 'Test Instance Name' column hence the test names should look better now.

    Thanks
    Christine

  4. 4 votes
    Vote
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: facebook google
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    0 comments  ·  General  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    AdminChristine (Admin, PractiTest) shared this idea  · 
  5. 9 votes
    Vote
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: facebook google
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    5 comments  ·  General  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    AdminChristine (Admin, PractiTest) commented  · 

    Hi,

    Kindly note that custom field of type URL is available in the system.

    Thanks
    Christine

  6. 3 votes
    Vote
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: facebook google
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    under review  ·  1 comment  ·  General  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    AdminChristine (Admin, PractiTest) commented  · 

    Thanks,

    Just one comment: presume you meant tests added to requirements

  7. 1 vote
    Vote
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: facebook google
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    2 comments  ·  General  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    AdminChristine (Admin, PractiTest) commented  · 

    Hi Marialena,

    Now I wanted to apologize for the very late response.

    Probably to answer this question, I won't have enough knowledge, but as I know you need to call the data that will be put to the ‘data/files/data’ parameter once the execution is done and the file is ready. Could you schedule sending the request to PractiTest once two operations are done? Again sorry if I miss something here.

  8. 4 votes
    Vote
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: facebook google
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    2 comments  ·  General  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    AdminChristine (Admin, PractiTest) shared this idea  · 
  9. 7 votes
    Vote
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: facebook google
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    3 comments  ·  General  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →

    Hi Przemek,

    Thank you for your request.

    Kindly note that Test Name includes spellcheck of the browser you are using.

    That’s correct that browser spellcheck is not available in the Description field since Markdown doesn’t support it, but we are working on this issue and will keep you updated.

    Thanks again.
    Christine

    AdminChristine (Admin, PractiTest) commented  · 

    Hi Przemek,

    Kindly note that we can enable a Markdown spellcheck for your user if you wish. The only limitation is that it checks spelling, but doesn't give suggestions.

    Please let us know if you would like us to do this.

    Thanks
    Christine

    AdminChristine (Admin, PractiTest) commented  · 

    Hi Przemek,

    Thanks for your message.

    The steps description uses Markdown as well, that's why there is no browser spellcheck there.

    Thanks again and we will update you regarding any progress in this request.

    Best regards,
    Christine

  10. 4 votes
    Vote
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: facebook google
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    under review  ·  6 comments  ·  General  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    AdminChristine (Admin, PractiTest) commented  · 

    Thanks, got your point. Will discuss it with the team.

    AdminChristine (Admin, PractiTest) commented  · 

    Thanks for the clarification.

    Probably in this case will be better to create a filter in the relevant module and then apply the operations you mentioned. Will it work for you?

    AdminChristine (Admin, PractiTest) commented  · 

    Hi,

    Thanks for your request.

    Do you mean the 'batch edit' operation to search results?

    Thanks
    Christine

  11. 6 votes
    Vote
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: facebook google
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    2 comments  ·  General  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    AdminChristine (Admin, PractiTest) commented  · 

    Hi,

    Thanks for your request.

    According to PractiTest methodology we believe that the last run is a meaningful run for results.

    If you have several runs of the same test instance that should be reviewed , we recommend to create several instances of the same test for that where you will be able to create custom fields.

    Will this approach work for you?

    Thanks
    Christine

  12. 0 votes
    Vote
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: facebook google
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    1 comment  ·  General  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    AdminChristine (Admin, PractiTest) commented  · 

    Hi,

    We did not include this type of notifications to the personal notifications as the customers asked to get notifications when they delete several entities, hence they will be aware of the entities deleted and always can refer to the notifications they got.

    Are you sure that these notifications should be disabled?

    Thanks
    Christine

  13. 1 vote
    Vote
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: facebook google
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    under review  ·  0 comments  ·  General  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    AdminChristine (Admin, PractiTest) shared this idea  · 
  14. 1 vote
    Vote
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: facebook google
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    under review  ·  0 comments  ·  General  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    AdminChristine (Admin, PractiTest) shared this idea  · 
  15. 1 vote
    Vote
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: facebook google
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    2 comments  ·  General  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →

    Hi Angela,

    Thanks for your feature request.

    Kindly note that you can add requirements, tests via the ‘Traceability’ tab, but that’s correct that you need to add one by one.

    We have a similar feature request where customers asking about ability to add all tests/requirements residing in a specific filter to a test/requirement. This feature is similar to the feature we have in Test Sets & Runs when you can add all tests residing in a filter to Test Set.

    Will this feature work for you?

    Best regards,
    Christine

    AdminChristine (Admin, PractiTest) commented  · 

    Hi Angela,

    Thanks for your reply.

    Please note that the 'Batch Edit' option is designed for editing system and custom fields and adding comments, but for changing values in Traceability tab. The Traceability tab was added to Requirements, Tests and Issues in order to allow users to see the entire picture of entities linked to a specific requirement, test and issue and also to modify linked entities there.

    Having said that, the filter option as a feature that will allow you to batch add linked entities is being reviewed and we will update you with any progress on it.

    Thanks again for making PractiTest better!

    Best regards,
    Christine

  16. 4 votes
    Vote
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: facebook google
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    planned  ·  1 comment  ·  General  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    AdminChristine (Admin, PractiTest) shared this idea  · 
  17. 1 vote
    Vote
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: facebook google
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    under review  ·  1 comment  ·  General  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    AdminChristine (Admin, PractiTest) commented  · 

    Hi,

    Following our chat wanted to specify your request.

    Need to add traceability changes as adding requirements to test to the History tab within the test.

  18. 1 vote
    Vote
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: facebook google
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    under review  ·  1 comment  ·  General  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    AdminChristine (Admin, PractiTest) commented  · 

    Hi Keerthi,

    Thanks for your feature request.

    Wanted to specify your request as we previously discussed.

    PractiTest allows to drag and drop dashboard items within dashboard tab. The request is to be able to drag and drop items across dashboard tabs.

  19. 4 votes
    Vote
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: facebook google
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    under review  ·  0 comments  ·  General  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    AdminChristine (Admin, PractiTest) shared this idea  · 
  20. 1 vote
    Vote
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: facebook google
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    under review  ·  0 comments  ·  General  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    AdminChristine (Admin, PractiTest) shared this idea  · 
← Previous 1

Feedback and Knowledge Base