559 results found
-
9 votes
-
Enable automatic download of reports
Currently get an automated email with a link to click to download the report. I would like the report downloaded automatically.
E.g. If I could anticipate the link to download the report (as currently added to the email) I could generate it automatically and hence download the report. You might also provide an api style interface such that the report is available in chrome as a page which can be extracted from chrome as JSON.
P.s. Not a good solution for me, but still a solution, have you thought about a google drive interface for the reports (and exports) to…
3 votes -
1 vote
-
Add project name column to Slack integration
As a company with many related projects that are reported to the same channel, we have a need for distinguishing between the tests belonging to different projects
1 vote -
Add status 'SKIP' for skipped test case while run an instance
Hi Admin,
while running of an instance, it had better provide a status 'SKIP‘ so that we can know how many test cases 'SKIP' in regression testing.
1 vote -
Adding a Header on External Dashboard
Similar to JIRA headers.
Ex: A dynamic todays date added to current release.1 vote -
Support to create / modify dashboard via API
Hi, While we integrated API into our testing pipeline, noticed that it could not create / modify dashboard via API.
Suggest to support this feature.
1 vote -
Add Test Data field to Test Run similar to Preconditions for the Test
Similar to Preconditions in Test Run, add a field Test Data that shows up while running a test
3 votes -
Ability to create a burn up report.
If we know of a particular release date and we want to track test execution to that date, then a burn up report can help us track and highlight risks at a very early stage.
This should take into account the testers available for the execution so that it can work out the velocity accordingly1 vote -
Sync attachments from ADO to PRactiTest and Vice Versa
Currently we are not syncing the attachments from ADO requirements or bugs to PractiTest nor from PractiTest bugs to ADO. It would be great if we can do a 2 way sync for the requirements as well.
Many times the big requirements have attached docs which are essential for a tester to see to create test cases.
Bugs in ADO will have screenshots and log files attached and they need to sync across to the PractiTest as well.
Also when a bug is created from PractiTest to flow thru to ADO it will/should have screen shots attached along with other…24 votes -
Ability to sync the comments from requirements and bugs from ADO to PractiTest and vice versa
Currently when the requirements and bugs are synced from ADO, the comments are not synced.
For requirements the comments have valuable information reflecting the changes and doubts which are important for a tester to know while creating test cases so it is very critical to include the comments as well.Also if a tester has certain doubts on a requirements if there is a 2 way sync he can just post the comments on the PractiTest and they should flow to the linked requirement card in the ADO.
For bugs, since the developers won't always have access to PractiTest, the will…
31 votes -
Add a Check Box for Tests that are just Steps that are reoccuring but not needed in the TestSet
There are many cases where "Login as.." for instance is just called by other tests so that is not repeated in every Test, These "Login as" Tests are necessary but not necessary in the TestSets. Could a small check box, "Do not include in TestSet" be added so when we create a TestSet the Unnecessary tests are not visible or Color Coded to let the Tester know that Test is not needed in the TestSet? We are currently using xx as a prefix in the Test Name to distinguish these types of tests. Love your product!
3 votes -
Give users the ability to add custom fields at Test Step Level.
You should give the users to add fields at test step level.
They should be allowed to Add things like Test Data for a particular step like Large Queries it it. For us the Test Precondition or Test Description or Test Name cannot be used for that purpose.
22 votes -
Remove blank columns & rows from detailed report (Excel)
When Practitest generates a 'detail' report of tests, in Excel format, there are two blank columns on the left (A & B) and a lot of blank rows padding the report. These blanks waste space on the screen/ sheet when printing. I have to manually remove these every time, which wastes time. Please could you take them out of the default report ?
8 votes -
Add ability to get the steps based on filter-id.
I want to get the steps of test cases which are in Automation status (Automation filter).
3 votes -
Goto Test field should find tests by name
NARRATIVE: The "Goto Tests…" field currently only works for test IDs. It would be nice to be able to go to tests by test name as well.
STEPS TO DUPE:
1. Go to the Test Library module.
2. Type an existing test name into the "Goto Tests…" field
3. Push return.RESULT: All tests for the currently selected filter are displayed.
EXPECTED: To go to the test with the matching name.
3 votes -
Clone Test Set with current test status
There should be an option to allow the user to clone either as anew Test Set or with existing Test Status.
It will help us to run the same test set with multiple versions of our product.
Currently cloning reset all the test statuses.
3 votes -
Add a way to trigger run machine to start a test set
Our automation test execution (ATE) machine can receive a remotely command and put into queue, commands from queue will be pulled out and processed, such as 'Build', 'Program', 'Run', 'Report'... but I can't find any way to trigger our ATE from Practitest server now.
3 votes -
Show Requirement Description field
Requirement description is very important for users to overview all requirement list or check duplication after importing from excel file but now user only can see requirement description by view each requirement detail.
3 votes -
Give option to only run tests on instances that have 'ready' status within test set
At the moment, when I've created a new test I will leave it as 'draft' status until the feature comes available for me to test. However, I like to have my test sets organised and ready to go. It would be useful to have an option to only test the instances within a test set that have 'ready' status. This would save accidentally initiating tests for the instances that are not yet ready and are still in draft.
2 votes
- Don't see your idea?