561 results found
-
hidden fields from UI
is there a way to create a field for tests that is not shown on the screen when writing the test?
i want to use it for automation API to mark tests that are automated but prevent manual ppl from changing this field.1 voteIdo Tandy responded
-
In practitest I miss the ability to report issues on group or organisation level. It would be nice if it would be possible to filter o
In practitest I miss the ability to report issues on group or organisation level. It would be nice if it would be possible to filter on group or organisation. From project management point of view a must have.
1 vote -
Wildcard search on fields
It would be nice to have advanced options for queries like being able to filter with wildcards *
1 vote -
Tests fields values should be saved. It is very annoying to fill the same values again and again every test we r running.
For every test we r running there r a lot of fields we need to fill- build, version, detected by….
We need to fill them manually every time. It is very annoying.
My suggestion that it will work like in QC – the fields value should be saved until I will fill something else.
It can save a lot of time and energy.1 vote -
Allow importing comments from spread sheet
Currently I can import all issues/defects to PractiTest but the comment column can't be imported. This is really a hassle. Comments are really important to track the progress of a defect. Highly suggest that this feature be developed!!
1 vote -
allowing people (not just account owner) to export attachments
Currently only account owner can export attachments. This doesn't make sense. The system should allow more types of users to export attachments.
1 vote -
Configuration of Tester
As an administrator of an account, when I make a new user group for Testers, I would like a feature where the tester is only able to see test sets and runs and not the library.
1 vote -
Disable Step Outcome Options When Step is Being Added/Edited
When you add a new step to a Test Run, it's so easy to write out the Step, and then immediately click the outcome button. When you do this, everything that was typed was lost. Either make clicking the outcome button save any changes to a Step, or disable them so the user has to either accept the changes or discard them intentionally.
1 vote -
Auto reassign defect to defect owner, when status change to fixed.
By change defect status to fixed,
system auto reassign defect to defect owner.
Once defect claim to fix, defect return to defect owner responsibility.1 vote -
1 vote
-
1 vote
-
Dependencies on params
Can we have feature of having different expected results depending on chosen params? It would be very useful in cases where you have similar steps (driven by param) but different exepected results.
1 vote -
Requirement adding/modification must be shown in the history tab of it
I think title explains it :)
1 vote -
Link an Issue automatically as a failed Status of a Requirement.
Edith said to me: With regards to the Requirement, the status will be Failed, but the Issue will not be linked automatically. You can link it manually. I agree with you that the Issue should be linked automatically and will happy if you can add it as a feature request here.
1 vote -
Clicking on link to attachement opens a file instead of give choice open or download
In Firefox browser I spotted following situation - when I click on link to attachment, PractiTest opens a file instead of call browser's dialog with option to choice - open or download a file.
1 vote -
Huge memory usage on Firefox 56 @Windows 7
I spotted Practitest is the reason of huge memory usage in FF browser with Windows 7. Usage is gradually increasing, especially when I open it in few tabs. It is laggy as well, but only within tabs where I have Practitest.
After closing tabs with Practitest memory is not released.
1 vote -
Add an instance counter that gives visibilty to the number of Pass/Fail/Total runs.
A test is added to the Test Library that contains parameter values. That test is added to a Test Set multiple times with a variation in the parameter value. Each parameter test is run multiple times, some pass, some may fail. The overall pass of the test set instance can be determined by the admin user with pass fail criteria (percentage based) with a specification on the required number of runs per test instance. Eg. If there is only 1 pass and 99 fails the overall parameter instance should not be pass when there is a 100% pass run requirement.…
1 vote -
TestSet name in Permutations view
When I do permutations over TestSets in the upper part there is TestSet ID. Can it be changed to TestSet name? I often do permutations of many TestSets one after another and sometimes forget which TestSet I have now.
1 vote -
1 vote
-
Better Two way integration
As a user I would like to use the two way integration with the possibility of being able to add manually issues. Example: 2 teams will integrate with PractiTest and the 3rd will still add manually issues since they all work on the same project.
1 vote
- Don't see your idea?