603 results found
-
Instances : Assigned for filter to be made available
Allow users to create a filter in the Test Sets & Runs module that will only show test sets with instances assigned to them.
This way if a tester has been assigned multiple test instances across different test sets, he can see all of them at one shot instead of going through each test set to find what's allocated to him.
3 votes -
Allow either cloning or sharing custom fields to step parameters
Mostly custom fields would be used as step parameters. It would be great if we can allow cloning or sharing or copying custom fields to step parameters
3 votes -
Allow to customize a HEADER for the exported PDFs, so they can be usd as Controlled Documents
This should include:
1. Company Logo
2. Document title
3. Date of issue
4. Document ID number and Revision
5. Number of pages (current page / Total number of pages)1 vote -
Should be able to download attachments per test
For auditing purposes would be nice to be able to download the screen shots or attachments for each test.
This way i can send to the auditors during audit season
3 votes -
Step parameter in preconditions field
We would like to have step parameters in the preconditions field as well.
5 votes -
Custom Field - Edit Value - Linked List type
Custom Fields Customization missing edit value name (Linked List)
This can be done for Link type but not for Linked List
1 vote -
Upload attachments directly to Jira issues created from PractiTest
It would be nice to have the option to directly add attachments when creating an issue using the Jira integration.
In our case issues created require a certain backup to be attached, right now testers always have to open the created issue in Jira afterwards to add this. This would be made easier if attachments could be uploaded directly when creating an issue from PractiTest.
Possibly even uploading attachments from the test run as well to provide some more background information / possible ease of use.
3 votes -
Implement Full Traceability - If Req linked to Test Case & Issue linked to Test Case, then system should show Req & Issues linked,
Implement Automatic Full Traceability - If I have a Req linked to a Test Case & I create an Issue that is linked to a Test Case, then the system should automatically link and show the Req & Issue linked. I should not have to manually link them.
3 votes -
Support Issue updating provision of batch API
in the big project and data increasing, we noticed the API call limits stops developing and integrating with automation testing pipleline.
It would be a great to run testing and updating issues if PractiTest support provision of batch API to avoiding limitation of API call (100 / 1 mins, and returned records )
9 votes -
Copy and paste parameters across Test Instances
It would be very time saving being able to copy and paste step parameters across Test Instances in a TestSet.
The current workaround is to write the parameters somewhere else, then bulk edit the Test Instances with the parameters to be pasted.Even better, a spreadsheet-like editor would solve this issue: one row per Test Instance, one column per parameter.
3 votes -
Search also across Test Instances
Extend "Search" scope to all Test Instances, including the expected and actual results.
It would be useful to locate a specific instance that fails with a specific value/output.3 votes -
Make it possible to create requirements in PractiTest and have them carry over to Jira
It would be nice if you could create a requirement in PractiTest and have it display as a story / task / subtask in Jira. It's possible to bring in requirements from Jira into PractiTest but not the other way around.
3 votes -
PractiTest Test Management for Jira Add-on usage
We need to determine add-on usage in our instance. We are sure this add-on is in use; however, we are unsure where. Can you please provide the best method to determine where or if it is being used?
Thank you!
1 vote -
1 vote
-
Report Cloning needs to be better and more functional
this is about the clone report feature not being helpful. I need to make exact same reports for different filters. I try to clone but the cloning report feature is not helpful at all. I need to select the displayed fields in the report every time, even if I clone it. Ideally, cloning should automatically clone the list of display fields that I have chosen in my source report but it doesn't happen.
3 votes -
Better navigation for editing Dashboard Items: The navigation between items of a dashboard is cumbersome. If I need to edit all items of a
The navigation between items of a dashboard is cumbersome. If I need to edit all items of a dashboard, I dont have the option to go to the next item in the same dashboard. I need to first go back to main dashboard and then go to the correct dashboard and then to the correct item
1 vote -
Allow multi-lists in the creation of permutations
When creating permutations only values from single selection lists are given, items from multi-list are just as valid to build test sets from.
1 vote -
Allow access to Test Step Actual Result data via the Practitest API
Allow access to Test Step Actual Result data via the Practitest API
We would like to create a bespoke report using our existing report server. To do this we need to extract all of the Test Result data via the API. We are using the API so that we can automate the process.
[1] At the moment you are unable to access the Test Step Actual Results via the API.
[2] At the moment you are unable to access the Test Run or Test Step attachments via the API
This make building a comprehensive bespoke report difficult. Would it be…
2 votes -
Add option to auto fill actual results with custom text
The past two QA jobs I've had required us to fill in our actual results even if they matched the expected results. Currently they want us to fill it in with something simple to show that we acknowledged it passing as expected, for regulatory purposes.
Could we get some type of configuration for this so that if we pass or pass all and leave the fields blank they will be filled in with custom text (e.g.: "Passed as expected")?
4 votes -
Limit for every field should be increased from 255 to 500 characters.
Limit for every field should be increased from 255 to 500 characters.
1 vote
- Don't see your idea?