Skip to content

General

General

Categories

96 results found

  1. 0 votes
    Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    declined  ·  0 comments  ·  Admin →
  2. 0 votes
    Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    declined  ·  0 comments  ·  Admin →
  3. For example, if I'd like one Filter to get out of the Parent filter. Or, on the contrary, to put a Filter under another one.
    I know I can edit its setting, but it can be also nice if we could have such option in the view page itself - to drag and drop a filter to another place in hierarchy

    4 votes
    Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    declined  ·  0 comments  ·  Admin →
  4. We moved to the new pricing, and found that it works differently from the old one:
    In an old one, if we create a user group with permissions lower than those of Developer, each user in such group was still billed for $9.
    New pricing has a user group Commenters, and we're not billed for the users we add to this group. However, if we create a user group with LESS permissions than commenters - for example, without viewing permissions on certain module - we're billed for this as a Tester.

    I think this part of billing should worked as…

    1 vote
    Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    declined  ·  0 comments  ·  Admin →
  5. It would be better to see the changes in the test case history log when the test was updated by adding "+" (for addition) and "-" (for removal) signs in front of each change

    27 votes
    Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    declined  ·  0 comments  ·  Admin →
  6. Similar to Xbot triggering scripts from local machine, I'd like to either trigger Postman API Call/Request, or the whole collection via Practitest.

    3 votes
    Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    declined  ·  1 comment  ·  Admin →
  7. Whenever I need to clone Tests or Requirements I have to do double work of adding back linking between entities an option for cloning not only attachments but also linking between Requirements and Tests would help.

    26 votes
    Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    declined  ·  0 comments  ·  Admin →
  8. Please make it possible to link test cases between each other

    40 votes
    Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
  9. When creating filters and tag is selected as filter criteria - choose from list of used tags (select with search) to avoid spelling mistakes

    39 votes
    Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
  10. Rather than having to copy and paste parameters in from a datasheet, it would be good if we could map the parameters for multiple instances of a test case to a datasheet and import them
    eg Select 10 instances of a test case, click an 'bulk update parameter' button or similar, which can then map to an excel datasheet

    22 votes
    Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    declined  ·  2 comments  ·  Admin →
  11. standard .net test runners can produce .trx files e.g.

    vstest.console.exe /logger:trx foo.dll

    dotnet vstest --logger:trx foo.dll

    These are just XML files. We currently have to parse these xml files and perform hundreds of individual uploads, waiting 60 seconds every time the server throttles with HTTP 429

    It would be better if .trx files could just be uploaded to practitest to produce a run of a test set, and the parsing was done on the server.

    13 votes
    Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    declined  ·  0 comments  ·  Admin →
  12. 9 votes
    Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    declined  ·  3 comments  ·  Admin →
  13. Currently you can select "Run" and start from scratch, but no way to continue from where you left off.

    19 votes
    Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    declined  ·  1 comment  ·  Admin →
  14. Please add a way to clone an existing requirement (to be modified later).

    11 votes
    Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    declined  ·  3 comments  ·  Admin →
  15. For your French clients, translate in French.

    8 votes
    Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    declined  ·  1 comment  ·  Admin →
  16. Many companies use GitLab and they would warmly welcome a 2 way PT integration. At our company we conclude projects. One is developed in Redmine, the other is in GitLab. It would be nice to use PT for both platforms with equal funcionality.

    22 votes
    Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    declined  ·  1 comment  ·  Admin →
  17. 8 votes
    Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    declined  ·  1 comment  ·  Admin →
  18. Now, the only thing we can do to view Test Steps from Test Sets is by:
    1. Clicking the instance
    2. Click "Test in Test Library"

    which means we can only see steps for a particular test at a time.

    I'd suggest that you add the ability to view Test Steps directly from Test Sets, maybe by implementing display popover? Or maybe add another page that allows us to view all steps in all the tests in a certain test set. Thanks!

    41 votes
    Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    declined  ·  Ido Tandy responded

    This request has been rejected since it does not make sense from a methodological point of view.

  19. We want to be able to create filters from the API
    this will allow us to group text sets created via a pipeline and better organize what tests where ran where

    64 votes
    Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    1 comment  ·  Admin →

    Our Auto Filter feature (now with an additional hierarchy level) will ensure that a new filter will be automatically created for every new value of a List field, even if added via API.

  20. The feature "Call To Test" brings some limitations to us. I want to see if your team can provide some solutions or improvement plan. Thanks you!

    1. No tracability between parent test cases and the called tests
      • Tester is difficult to trace the relationship between parent and the called test
    2. Cannot preview the called test steps in the test cases. The test case only show the title of the called tests
      • It's time consuming to open the new tab to view cases one by one
      • Suggestion: Preview by clicking a button
    3. Export test cases: Test cases exports with only the title…
    24 votes
    Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    declined  ·  1 comment  ·  Admin →
← Previous 1 3 4 5
  • Don't see your idea?