Skip to content

General

General

Categories

(thinking…)

I suggest you ...

You've used all your votes and won't be able to post a new idea, but you can still search and comment on existing ideas.

There are two ways to get more votes:

  • When an admin closes an idea you've voted on, you'll get your votes back from that idea.
  • You can remove your votes from an open idea you support.
  • To see ideas you have already voted on, select the "My feedback" filter and select "My open ideas".
(thinking…)

Enter your idea and we'll search to see if someone has already suggested it.

If a similar idea already exists, you can support and comment on it.

If it doesn't exist, you can post your idea so others can support it.

Enter your idea and we'll search to see if someone has already suggested it.

67 results found

  1. Add the ability to create custom user group with same/lesser permissions as commenters to consume commenter license

    0 votes
    Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    Close
    Close
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    declined  ·  0 comments  ·  Admin →

  2. Ability to upload feature file for BDD tests via Firecracker

    0 votes
    Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    Close
    Close
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    declined  ·  0 comments  ·  Admin →

  3. User groups with permissions lower than Commenters should also be free from billing

    We moved to the new pricing, and found that it works differently from the old one:
    In an old one, if we create a user group with permissions lower than those of Developer, each user in such group was still billed for $9.
    New pricing has a user group Commenters, and we're not billed for the users we add to this group. However, if we create a user group with LESS permissions than commenters - for example, without viewing permissions on certain module - we're billed for this as a Tester.

    I think this part of billing should worked as…

    1 vote
    Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    Close
    Close
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    declined  ·  0 comments  ·  Admin →

  4. Running Postman call from Practitest

    Similar to Xbot triggering scripts from local machine, I'd like to either trigger Postman API Call/Request, or the whole collection via Practitest.

    3 votes
    Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    Close
    Close
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    declined  ·  1 comment  ·  Admin →

  5. Link test to test

    Please make it possible to link test cases between each other

    40 votes
    Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    Close
    Close
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    0 comments  ·  Admin →

  6. Allow to select from used tags when entering Tag as filter criteria

    When creating filters and tag is selected as filter criteria - choose from list of used tags (select with search) to avoid spelling mistakes

    39 votes
    Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    Close
    Close
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    0 comments  ·  Admin →

  7. Add the ability to color the step field text and also make it bold.

    9 votes
    Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    Close
    Close
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    declined  ·  3 comments  ·  Admin →

  8. Add the ability to view Test Steps directly from Test Sets

    Now, the only thing we can do to view Test Steps from Test Sets is by:
    1. Clicking the instance
    2. Click "Test in Test Library"

    which means we can only see steps for a particular test at a time.

    I'd suggest that you add the ability to view Test Steps directly from Test Sets, maybe by implementing display popover? Or maybe add another page that allows us to view all steps in all the tests in a certain test set. Thanks!

    41 votes
    Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    Close
    Close
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    2 comments  ·  Admin →
    declined  ·  Ido Tandy responded

    This request has been rejected since it does not make sense from a methodological point of view.

  9. Creation of filter via the API

    We want to be able to create filters from the API
    this will allow us to group text sets created via a pipeline and better organize what tests where ran where

    64 votes
    Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    Close
    Close
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    1 comment  ·  Admin →
    declined  ·  AdminYaniv (Product Manager, PractiTest) responded

    Our Auto Filter feature (now with an additional hierarchy level) will ensure that a new filter will be automatically created for every new value of a List field, even if added via API.

  10. Fix issue of exported report PDF number / bullet lists

    Since the time Practitest allowed rich text markup in test step description / expected result, it has caused some new issues to PDF report exporting that all the number list / bullet points would have become plain text with line breaks only.

    1 vote
    Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    Close
    Close
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    0 comments  ·  Admin →
    declined  ·  Christine responded

    Hi,

    Kindly note that the new Reports allow to create detailed reports for Tests where lists are displayed correctly.

    At this time the new reports are available to download as Excel, but we are planning to release PDF option soon. Please go to Reports, to access them.

    Thanks
    Christine

  11. Add a test to test set by typing the test number

    Add a test 'to test set' by typing the test number

    1 vote
    Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    Close
    Close
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    0 comments  ·  Admin →

  12. Add the ability to create automated permutations in a single test set

    For example if I had a test set that examine Log In screen.
    and I also have fields of OS/APP NAME/COUNTRY/(WIFI/3G)
    I can automatically create tests of
    Android + Preactiapp + USA + WIFI
    IOS + Practiapp + USA + WIFI
    Android + Preactiapp + USA + 3G
    IOS + Practiapp + USA + 3G
    Android + Preactiapp + CANADA+ WIFI
    IOS + Practiapp + CANADA+ WIFI
    Android + Preactiapp + CANADA+ 3G
    IOS + Practiapp + CANADA+ 3G

    3 votes
    Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    Close
    Close
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    0 comments  ·  Admin →

  13. add the ability to duplicate filters

    it would be very useful if we can duplicate the filters (instead of re creating them every time ) in case we need them in several places.

    70 votes
    Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    Close
    Close
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    7 comments  ·  Admin →
    declined  ·  AdminYaniv (Product Manager, PractiTest) responded

    We are not currently planning to add this feature. Instead, we recommend to use our Auto Filters, which now have an additional hierarchy level and soon will be available for Multi List and Linked List types of fields.
    With the Auto Filters, you'll be able to organize your data using Filter trees with less effort .

  14. "Show popular tags" like a dropdown

    The current view is not very useful. We cannot see all the existing tags.

    1 vote
    Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    Close
    Close
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    declined  ·  0 comments  ·  Admin →

  15. Add Tag's to dashboards Items (x / y fields, or group by tags)

    I need to create a pie chart (or similar) in order to display the Issues reported by team 1 vs team 2.

    Those teams are identified by tags.

    Currently, I have to create 2 different board items: one for team 1 and another for team 2, in order to display the issues reported by each one and compare them. However, what we need is a only one board with all the issues, group by these tags.

    Regards.

    3 votes
    Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    Close
    Close
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    0 comments  ·  Admin →

  16. Update Run Status after execution

    Sometimes we don't find some errors on execution time, and they are discovered later (by the client or others). We need to link that Issue to an already executed Run Status and also update the status to FAIL. Currently it cannot be done without the creation of another test set and/or a different execution.

    Maybe it could be added as a PractiTest Labs option. On that way we can decided if we allow or not this feature.

    2 votes
    Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    Close
    Close
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    0 comments  ·  Admin →
    declined  ·  Christine responded

    Hi Ángela,

    Thank you for contacting us.

    According to the scenario you described it seems to be a new run (execution) as you/your team members detected the issue after the previous run.

    Having said that if you prefer to change run status and to link the issue, you can always get back to a previous run and made according changes (when you are entering a Test Set – test instance – you will see runs of this instance that you can enter again if you wish).

    Best regards,
    Christine

  17. Allow just one or some Steps from a Test be added to a Test Set

    Right now it's not possible to add just one Step to a Test Set/Run. In situations where just part of a Test needs to be run (because a small change was made or part of the area might be affected by something else and should be regression tested), the tester has to mark many Steps as NA. It would be easier to choose just the Steps that are in scope for testing from an are that a Test covers.

    Example: A Test covers a form page, and a code change updates one of the radio button options. That radio button…

    1 vote
    Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    Close
    Close
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    2 comments  ·  Admin →
    declined  ·  Christine responded

    Hi Kelsey,

    Thank you for your feature request.

    Unfortunately we had to decline the request as our recommendation is to work with smaller test cases which will include relevant steps only.

    Thanks and have a good weekend!

    Best regards,
    Christine

  18. Pass and Filters

    1) Have the actual result default to the expected result when a user clicks Pass. Add a Pass All button so if the user can Pass the entire test in one click.
    2) When creating the filters instead of only a Save option have a Save and Add next option because now when you save it, you have to go back to settings and start again.
    3) ABility to copy filters across Requirements, Test Library, Test Sets, and Defects.

    1 vote
    Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    Close
    Close
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    declined  ·  1 comment  ·  Admin →

  19. Add option to collapse/expand steps that calls steps from other test cases in test set&runs

    Having the option to create a test case and call other test cases as steps is great feature. When you include that test in test set & run and start executing it then all steps from the called tests will be automatically displayed. This means if i called on my test , 4 other tests each with 10 steps , then my test will start with over 40 steps configuration. That makes the test heavy and all of that information might be useless for some people who can understand the whole test case only from the title. In order to…

    14 votes
    Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    Close
    Close
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    0 comments  ·  Admin →
    declined  ·  Adminjoel (Admin, PractiTest) responded

    The idea of this function is to copy the steps as an integral part of the test. For what you are describing it may make more sense to create a test set that includes these tests and then you can choose to use the FAST RUN option in case you don’t want to go into the tests and execute the steps one by one.

  20. Failed testcase status should update in JIRA, once it passed

    When I failed a testcases and create/link a defect, JIRA bug automatically shows the Failed test step. But later, after bug fix, when I ran the same test again and pass the defect, Jira bug is not showing the pass status, still showing old Failed test cases.

    1 vote
    Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    Close
    Close
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    0 comments  ·  Admin →
    declined  ·  Christine responded

    Hi Mahdi,

    Thanks for your feature request.

    After thorough consideration we have to decline it as it can’t be implemented due to methodological aspects.

    Best regards,
    Christine

← Previous 1 3 4
  • Don't see your idea?