603 results found
-
Add an ability to copy a step within a test
Currently you can copy steps from other tests but not from the same test
4 votes -
Next test should execute based upon filters and views.
When executing test cases, my testers should be able to filter and order them how they want to run them. So if I mix and match which tester is taking which test they should be able to filter by their name and test name and run the tests in that order. Right now it ignores the order and just goes to next test based upon how they where added to the test set.
4 votes -
4 votesIdo Tandy responded
-
4 votesIdo Tandy responded
-
Allow user to change order of filters
Currently the filters all display alphabetically unfortunately we don't always work this way, It would be helpful to allow you to set the order manually or just use drag and drop to organize them
4 votesIdo Tandy responded -
Able to use Markdown in comment or any text fields
It would be nice if we can use Markdown in comment or any text fields.
4 votesIdo Tandy responded -
4 votes
-
Add On-premise version support
Some companies due to information security policy want to install this software in local private server, not in cloud.
4 votes -
To add ability to make a private Task Board
That's great that we have the Task Board as a collaborative tool but it will be wonderful if will be the option to make it private.
4 votes -
Implement a step library, and/or allow "call to test" subsets
We have many steps that are reused all over the place, but not necessarily in the same order. We also have step sequences that, on their own, do not constitute complete tests. So we now have tests that exist only as step sources for other tests, sometimes with a single step each.
It would make more sense, as a user, to have a library of individual steps and step sequences that can be referenced without having to create tests just for this purpose.
Another way to do this would be to allow "call to test", or something like it, to…4 votes -
Picking up Assignee from Youtrack 2 way integration
When you change assignee in Youtrack would be nice in a future to send it to Practitest
4 votes -
Have an option to include/add test cases that aren't already part of test set.
Currently, when you want to add a test case that doesn't already exist in a test set, user has to scroll through pages to find the test case. Marking the test in red doesnt really help
It would be great to add an option to filter out test cases that are not part of the test set and add them.
4 votes -
Display item counts in filter tree
When I select a filter, I can see how many items are in it.
I would like to see in the tree view, at the end of the filter name, the same count
so I see
All (10)
V1.1 (3)
V10.9 (1)
Old (6)Etc
4 votes -
Ability to customize time for scheduling reports in practitest.
Currently practitest tools schedules all report (daily / weekly or monthly) at 6.00 AM but it would be great if tool allows to customize time for scheduling the reports to be delivered.
4 votesIdo Tandy responded -
Add parctitest "test id" from Jira (directly)when I created new ticket
Add parctitest "test id" from Jira (directly)when I created new ticket
4 votes -
Add filters to Dashboard so user can create dashboards based on their queries or filters
Like I want quarter wise data or team-wise data I have to create a report for that instead of that if you can give that functionality in the dashboard that will be very helpful.
4 votes -
Real time integration with Jira
In integration with Jira, any story created in jira has to be explicitly imported to PT. You can give user an option to enable real-time integration with JIra, which means, when a new user story in created in Jira, it is automatically imported to PT in requirements module.
4 votes -
[Dash Board] Excution Progress chart should support filter with more than 10000 instances
Current ly Excution Progress chart only support fillter of project with less than 10 000 instance (total instance of whole project).
4 votes -
Add option to auto fill actual results with custom text
The past two QA jobs I've had required us to fill in our actual results even if they matched the expected results. Currently they want us to fill it in with something simple to show that we acknowledged it passing as expected, for regulatory purposes.
Could we get some type of configuration for this so that if we pass or pass all and leave the fields blank they will be filled in with custom text (e.g.: "Passed as expected")?
4 votes -
4 votes
- Don't see your idea?