Skip to content

General

General

Categories

316 results found

  1. 7 votes
    Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    completed  ·  0 comments  ·  Admin →
  2. It would be utmost useful to be able to see any comments devs make in Jira on a bug so that Qa can see it in Practitest. Not just name, description and status.

    7 votes
    Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    1 comment  ·  Admin →
  3. Currently, we import test cases and test cases are uploaded in test library then, when we create a test set then we need to find out our test cases and link with the test set.
    It's little tedious task to find out test cases when there are more than 100 and add to test set.
    Please add import test feature within a test set.

    7 votes
    Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
  4. It would be great if you add keyboard shortcuts support for navigation/editing (like in gmail for instance).

    6 votes
    Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    completed  ·  Christine responded

    Hi,

    Please note that this feature request is completed.

    Best regards,
    PT Team

  5. have Open API for 3-rd party software to communicate with PractiTest

    6 votes
    Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    completed  ·  0 comments  ·  Admin →
  6. Customer Request: Add a test time system field, so when u look on a test view, you can see the plan time for running this whole view.

    6 votes
    Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    completed  ·  1 comment  ·  Admin →
  7. It would be very useful if Custom Views on Requirements could include filters based on field values as for Items and Tests.

    E.g. being able to get the requirements applicable to a particular domain that are testable but have not got any associated tests yet.

    6 votes
    Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    completed  ·  0 comments  ·  Admin →
  8. In Creating new test set indication is needed which tests are already in that test set. In order to see clear coverage of some feature and be sure that nothing was forgotten.

    6 votes
    Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    completed  ·  0 comments  ·  Admin →
  9. Ability to create a filter on view manager with only a part of the string

    6 votes
    Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    completed  ·  1 comment  ·  Admin →
  10. Linking external id (Requirement id) to test library and instances

    6 votes
    Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    completed  ·  3 comments  ·  Admin →
  11. If I have filtered/sorted a grid (ie issues), then click an item (ie an issue) in that grid, then return to the grid, the sort/filter is reset to default. That means I have to reset the sort/filter every time I look at an item on a grid. The filter/sort confiugration should be maintained for each grid during a session (at least).

    6 votes
    Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    completed  ·  1 comment  ·  Admin →
  12. We think the following would improve the Jira integration tremendously if implemented:
    - In the auto generated issue description (when clicking fail & issue) include the expected result

    • Make linking existing issues less cumbersome. At the moment users need to:
      1) Add the ID
      2) Navigate to the issue
      3) Edit it with the pt_id
      4) refresh in the step
      This should all ideally done by PT (itself + the Jira plugin)

    • Full 2 way integration: add a tab in Jira that lists hyperlinks of all the linked PT tests (other tools such as QMetry do this)

    6 votes
    Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    completed  ·  1 comment  ·  Admin →
  13. 6 votes
    Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
  14. For example, many of my tests include the same first three steps. It would be very convenient if I could create a test or shared steps that have those three steps and then insert them into each test. This way, if those steps changes, I would only need to edit them once, instead of for each test.

    6 votes
    Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
  15. I need to be able to see if a tester has deleted, added, or reordered test instances to a test set.

    6 votes
    Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    completed  ·  0 comments  ·  Admin →
  16. Example: System Version (1.0, 2.0, 3.0) custom field added to the test set. If I want to compare the results of all test instances for each Test Set execution based on this field, I need to have that value that I would enter into the Test Set automatically populate any tests in the set, and any issues that are created in the execution. Right now you have to bulk change the test instances with the System Version in order for them to show up in dashboards.

    6 votes
    Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)

    Hi all,

    Putting this request to completed since there is no real need to propagate these fields as now you can generate reports and dashboard graphs with taking values from other entities as Test or Test Set.

    Thanks,
    Yaniv

  17. add rich formatting in steps, it is necessary to tap validations

    6 votes
    Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
  18. Make it possible to show the JIRA status of a story which was imported using the JIRA plugin. for example, if a story is accepted on JIRA, we should see this updated in the practitest requirement

    6 votes
    Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
  19. Usually when we use Paramters we already have some set of possibilities in our minds. It would be perfect to have possibility of using drop-down list of possible parameters for given Instance.

    6 votes
    Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    completed  ·  2 comments  ·  Admin →
  20. We can already see that information through the Traceabilty, but currently I think that It's not possible to create a filter in order to get all the tests linked to a specific/s Requirement/s (for example, in order to create Test Sets for specifics requirements).

    We need to create an extra field with a list of requirements (manually added), when this information already exists and we have duplicate information.

    I think that the creation of tests by requirements is a very common way of work, and it's not easy to get right now.

    Thanks.

    6 votes
    Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)

    Hi,

    Thanks for your patience.

    Kindly note that we have recently added the ability to create filters with ‘Linked tests’, ‘Linked requirements’ and ‘Linked issues’ as available fields to filter by within the Test Library and the Requirements module.

    Thus you will always know what entities linked to your requirements and tests (see a few screenshots attached).

    Thanks for improving PractiTest.

    Best regards,
    Yaniv

  • Don't see your idea?