Settings and activity

  1. 1 vote
    Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    0 comments  ·  General  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    Fletch shared this idea  · 
  2. 5 votes
    Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    0 comments  ·  General  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    Fletch supported this idea  · 
  3. 19 votes
    Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    2 comments  ·  General  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    Fletch supported this idea  · 
    An error occurred while saving the comment
    Fletch commented  · 

    This is a much needed improvement for the parameter feature! It would make the whole experience of using parameters much more efficient.

    To be able to generate a testset of a test case that has parameters and being able to import a table of parameters to use as the iterations.

    Eg. Test case
    Step 1: Open browser
    Step 2: login with UN: {{user_name}} and PW: {{password}}
    Step 3: Press/click {{confirmation_method}}

    Parameter Table:
    Iteration | user_name | password | confirmation_method
    1 | bob | 1234 | login
    2 | bob | ApPlE | keyboard [Enter]
    3 | bob | 'blank' | cancel

    What this would do is allow quicker entry of parameters and generation of variable test cases, and an easier visualization of what parameters are being tested.

    This is a feature in Azure DevOps' Test Management Suite {poke, poke}

    I used up my last available votes for this :) !!!

  4. 34 votes
    Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    2 comments  ·  General  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    Fletch supported this idea  · 
    An error occurred while saving the comment
    Fletch commented  · 

    We have a lot of test cases that utilize parameters in order to make the test more reusable and manageable to make test updates that propagate. Depending on the parameter choices the test case may then be relevant to different requirements. In this way making a test set that meets a requirement would make more sense as the test set is configured with specific parameters.

  5. 8 votes
    Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    under review  ·  1 comment  ·  General  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    An error occurred while saving the comment
    Fletch commented  · 

    I receive questions from PMs looking at requirements wanting to know why a parent requirement says "not covered", this makes them nervous (even after explaining why. It would save a lot of time to get correct parent status by not having to manually give the parent all the same test cases as its children.

    I would suggest that the inheritance be a check box to be additive to the ability to assign a specific test or tests to the parent as well as inheriting (or not).

    Fletch supported this idea  · 
  6. 4 votes
    Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    under review  ·  0 comments  ·  General  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    Fletch supported this idea  · 
  7. 7 votes
    Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    2 comments  ·  General  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    Fletch supported this idea  · 
  8. 1 vote
    Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    0 comments  ·  General  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    Fletch shared this idea  · 
  9. 1 vote
    Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    0 comments  ·  General  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    Fletch shared this idea  · 
  10. 34 votes
    Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    waiting for supporters  ·  2 comments  ·  General  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    Fletch supported this idea  · 
  11. 70 votes
    Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    under review  ·  7 comments  ·  General  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    Fletch supported this idea  · 
  12. 9 votes
    Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    5 comments  ·  General  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    Fletch supported this idea  · 
  13. 1 vote
    Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    0 comments  ·  General  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    under review  ·  Christine responded

    Hi,

    Thanks for your feature request.

    We will review it and keep you updated.

    Best regards,
    Christine

    Fletch shared this idea  ·