General

General

Categories

  1. It will be useful for the users to have a option to copy whole steps (description & expected Result) from an existing test to a new one.

    20 votes
    Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    1 comment  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
  2. Currently you can select "Run" and start from scratch, but no way to continue from where you left off.

    19 votes
    Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    1 comment  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
  3. Many companies use GitLab and they would warmly welcome a 2 way PT integration. At our company we conclude projects. One is developed in Redmine, the other is in GitLab. It would be nice to use PT for both platforms with equal funcionality.

    19 votes
    Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    waiting for supporters  ·  0 comments  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
  4. Rather than having to copy and paste parameters in from a datasheet, it would be good if we could map the parameters for multiple instances of a test case to a datasheet and import them
    eg Select 10 instances of a test case, click an 'bulk update parameter' button or similar, which can then map to an excel datasheet

    19 votes
    Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    2 comments  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
  5. Conditional Mandatory Fields - If I have a field that is value X, then make one or two the selected fields mandatory to fill in (or select). If value is not X then either grey out the fields or make the other one or two fields not required.

    18 votes
    Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    waiting for supporters  ·  3 comments  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
  6. For example we have a view with a lot of child views and now We would like to create the same view but with a different parent filter. So we would like to clone the existing tree and modify it instead of creating it from scratch.

    17 votes
    Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    under review  ·  3 comments  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
  7. Would be nice to have a global search/replace string within a project for tests. Last minute code implementations could necessitate 100's of test case step updates to keep the tests current.

    16 votes
    Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    3 comments  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
  8. Is there a way of making reviewing test cases easier?

    We can mark the tests ready for review, but would be easy if we have some GUI support to add the review comments to the steps or description.

    We don't have to rely on other tools to send review comments etc if it is supported in PT itself.

    16 votes
    Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    1 comment  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    under review  ·  Christine responded

    Hi,

    Thank you for contacting us.

    Kindly note that you can add comments to tests within General tab and also you can use rich text formatting in steps in order to leave comments in different color.

    Will it work for you?

    Best regards,
    Christine

  9. 15 votes
    Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    0 comments  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
  10. 15 votes
    Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    waiting for supporters  ·  2 comments  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
  11. My requirement is to add jira issue with assignee list from jira and there are some custom jira field which are mandotory to post an issue in our project.

    So can we have some way that we can create or import that fields and can have at the time of Reporting issue

    Also ability to use Both the defect tracking tools external integeration as well as Prati Internal simultaneously.

    15 votes
    Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    4 comments  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
  12. Currently filter Types supported: Issue, Test, TestSet, Requirement. Can you also please add 'Instance' to the filter type support. We include quite a few custom fields on our instances and it would be nice to create a filter using these custom fields for all the instances.

    14 votes
    Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    under review  ·  1 comment  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
  13. There are several fields in JIRA that we need to be reflected in PractiTest. In particular we use a fix in version field to associate releases in Jira and we need that field to be updated in the corresponding PractiTest ticket. Other fields such as priority should be mapped and synchronized.

    We spend a copious amount of time with each release/sprint updating Requirements in PractiTest to reflect what the PMs have assigned for the current development cycle. Each time a requirement falls out of scope or a new on is added, we have to manually update PractiTest.

    14 votes
    Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    under review  ·  2 comments  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
  14. We are facing following issue while integrating with JIRA and recommend these options should be available

    1 - Unable to see the attachment while doing the Sync with Jira issue - attached should be sync with JIRA . it will help to explain the issue
    2 - Unable to see the user comment in issue while doing the sync with JIRA. – it should sync the user comment so that we don’t have to go to Jira to see the comments
    3 - New issue option is disabled once we integrate with JIRA , it should be enabled . it…

    14 votes
    Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    0 comments  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
  15. standard .net test runners can produce .trx files e.g.

    vstest.console.exe /logger:trx foo.dll

    dotnet vstest --logger:trx foo.dll

    These are just XML files. We currently have to parse these xml files and perform hundreds of individual uploads, waiting 60 seconds every time the server throttles with HTTP 429

    It would be better if .trx files could just be uploaded to practitest to produce a run of a test set, and the parsing was done on the server.

    13 votes
    Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    0 comments  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
  16. 13 votes
    Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    waiting for supporters  ·  1 comment  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
  17. The ability to go into the 'Requirements' section in PractiTest and have an option to 'Generate From Jira'. This would grab an attachment (Excel, CSV etc) from the Jira ticket, import it into PractiTest, generate a test case from it and link it to the requirement

    13 votes
    Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    under review  ·  0 comments  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
  18. It is not currently possible to filter test cases based on the "Automation" checkbox on the test case. Please add the ability to filter test cases by that element.

    13 votes
    Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    under review  ·  1 comment  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
  19. As a practitest user, I want to clone my test cases and attributes, specifically folder location.

    Acceptance Criteria:
    If the folder structure does not exist, create the folder directory (a unix example would be mkdir -p /root/parent/leaf where if only /root exists, the rest of the directory is created.
    Provide an option not to create and place in the folder structure

    13 votes
    Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    0 comments  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
  20. We need the ability to get all filters for a project through the practitest test API. Currently we are trying to use the API to generate an internal report based on test sets in a test filter.

    We can filter the test sets by the filter-id but we have no way to prompt the user which filters are available to generate the report on.

    Maybe something like:
    https://api.practitest.com/api/v2/projects/YOUR_PROJECT_ID/filters.json

    13 votes
    Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    under review  ·  0 comments  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
  • Don't see your idea?