Settings and activity

  1. 10 votes
    Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    under review  ·  1 comment  ·  General  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    An error occurred while saving the comment
    Anonymous commented  · 

    Hi Anthony - thanks for sending this - I won't vote again as this request is the one I raised in 2018 ! It's still a big issue for us though - it would be really good to be able to add a specific custom field to the values that a user role can edit. We want most of our users to be able to edit the 'run on build' field, they may be contractors - but not give them wider permissions to edit field values

    Anonymous shared this idea  · 
  2. 7 votes
    Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    1 comment  ·  General  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    Anonymous shared this idea  · 
  3. 6 votes
    Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    1 comment  ·  General  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    An error occurred while saving the comment
    Anonymous commented  · 

    This would be a really useful thing for us to do - when we create reports at the end of a project we would often like to move executed tests, with their results, from one set to another

    Anonymous shared this idea  · 
  4. 3 votes
    Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    under review  ·  1 comment  ·  General  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    Anonymous supported this idea  · 
    An error occurred while saving the comment
    Anonymous commented  · 

    As we near the end of another project, reviewing the existing linked issues in Practitest is time conduming. it would speed things up if we could create filters on tests that have 'linked bugs'

    Anonymous shared this idea  · 
  5. 3 votes
    Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    under review  ·  1 comment  ·  General  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    An error occurred while saving the comment
    Anonymous commented  · 

    As we near the end of a project, going through issue IDs and then looking up the issue description and making a report manually takes us a lot of time

    Anonymous supported this idea  · 
    Anonymous shared this idea  · 
  6. 22 votes
    Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    0 comments  ·  General  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    Anonymous supported this idea  · 
  7. 26 votes
    Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    under review  ·  0 comments  ·  General  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    Anonymous supported this idea  · 
  8. 34 votes
    Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    under review  ·  2 comments  ·  General  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    An error occurred while saving the comment
    Anonymous commented  · 

    We currently work round this (e.g. when reviewing tests), by tagging tests with a label, and then creating filters in the test library based on the labels. Then we review all the tests that are in that filter.

  9. 70 votes
    Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    under review  ·  7 comments  ·  General  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    Anonymous supported this idea  · 
  10. 1 vote
    Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    0 comments  ·  General  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
  11. 3 votes
    Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    2 comments  ·  General  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    under review  ·  Christine responded

    Hi Angela,

    Thanks for your feature request.

    Kindly note that you can add requirements, tests via the ‘Traceability’ tab, but that’s correct that you need to add one by one.

    We have a similar feature request where customers asking about ability to add all tests/requirements residing in a specific filter to a test/requirement. This feature is similar to the feature we have in Test Sets & Runs when you can add all tests residing in a filter to Test Set.

    Will this feature work for you?

    Best regards,
    Christine

  12. 2 votes
    Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    0 comments  ·  General  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    under review  ·  Christine responded

    Hi Clare,

    Thanks for your feature request. We will review it and get back to you.

    In the meantime you can fail & issue step in order to report a new bug and then to change Failed status to Passed.

    Thanks again and have a good day!

    Best regards,
    Christine

    Anonymous shared this idea  · 
  13. 17 votes
    Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    under review  ·  3 comments  ·  General  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    An error occurred while saving the comment
    Anonymous commented  · 

    We would like to be able to clone filters within a project, and also between projects, when creating the new project (i.e. if the filter is based on a system or custom field that is being cloned, then the filter should be cloned too)