General

General

Categories

  1. In the tabular with steps report it is not possible to configure which fields to add to the issues tab, for example, priority.

    1 vote
    Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    0 comments  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
  2. Step names are not required within the tool and it is an extra hassle to have to include them when we import test cases from a spreadsheet. Could you make that a non-required field when importing?

    1 vote
    Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    0 comments  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
  3. Currently, I am using an extraction of issues and test statues to identify in Excel:
    - Failed tests linked to closed issues => for testers to update the status of the test
    - Failed tests not linked to any issue => for testers to link them to an issue
    - Highlight the issues that need to be replied to or retested (e.g. rejected, fixed)

    This involves:
    - Duplicating lines where tests are linked to several issues
    - Vlookups between issue statues and test statuses

    My idea would be to have triggers in the UI and perhaps also by email to…

    1 vote
    Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    0 comments  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
  4. BDD automation has a feature call "Scenario Outline", where you can define a table data for the test. This feature is based in step parameters.
    PractiTest hosts also a step parameters feature, although the table data is defined at run time, unlike BDD automation, which is defined at test definition time
    This can be solved with a custom field hosting the table data, where automation framework can retrieve it using the API, but the problem is when we try to create a run.
    I have tried FireCracker with a Scenario Outline test and the report is not accurate because it…

    1 vote
    Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    0 comments  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
  5. 1 vote
    Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    0 comments  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
  6. Right now it will just write "Updated step " and you cannot know what step was updated, were if you have step names it will write "Updated step [step name]"
    We find it time consuming to always name steps, and step name and step description are often duplicates, so we would like to have the option to not user step names, but still get the history when steps are changed

    1 vote
    Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    0 comments  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
  7. When adding test cases to test sets, the pop-up you have to select them in has no option to sort the listed test cases - which makes us very dependent on detailed filters or the list becomes hard to work with for us with +10 sub-pages to click between to find the right test case.
    We suggest to enable sorting on the columns, so we can sort by name or ID.

    1 vote
    Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    0 comments  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
  8. We continually get the same error when importing tests from an excel sheet. We fixed the author names to the current user, but continue to get the same error after trying to re-import the newly edited and saved file. This happens even when trying to login and import from a different browser and even when attempting it with a different user.

    1 vote
    Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    0 comments  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
  9. On the Dashboard, there's a Test Execution Progress chart. I'd also like to see something similar for Requirements.

    1 vote
    Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    0 comments  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
  10. The system should give the user the ability to update the planned execution on the Test Instance grid (Same functionality as the "Assigned To" field

    You can currently use the batch edit function but flexibility to use as per the Assigned To field would be much better

    Thanks Mike Siddall

    1 vote
    Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    0 comments  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
  11. Currently I am unable to forward planning the execution activities and display in the dashboards

    The dashboard only allows planning for the current date and dates in the past

    1 vote
    Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    0 comments  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
  12. Under a Test Set, one can set Planned Execution, I'd like to send out an email reminder for this planned execution with reminder options (week, 24 prior, or day of). Currently, we can get this from setting up a filter or report but it would be nice to have email reminders sent out to assigned.

    1 vote
    Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    0 comments  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
  13. When creating Exploratory Tests, we would like the ability to make Guide Points a required field. Sometimes users may only fill out the Test Charter when it would be beneficial to include Guide Points.

    1 vote
    Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    0 comments  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
  14. For a particular Run Instance, I'd like to get number of runs for that instance.

    1 vote
    Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    0 comments  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
  15. (Short report description/summary to be added manually by the reporter)

    0 votes
    Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    under review  ·  0 comments  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
  16. Say you have a mandatory field named 'Feature' in test cases. You might want to create a view named Features according to the value the Feature field has.
    Currently you have to specify a view for each value of Feature.
    Moreover, if you have a new feature, you have to add it manually to the filter.

    0 votes
    Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    under review  ·  0 comments  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
  17. Add incidences to jira from paractitest

    0 votes
    Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    0 comments  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    Omri Berkovich responded

    Hi,
    Can you please clarify?
    Using the current integration, you can create Issus in PractiTest and they would be shown on Jira.

  18. We want to able our MP give feedback about the tests.
    the problem is the comment permission and the edit permission are the same one.

    0 votes
    Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    under review  ·  0 comments  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
  19. We discussed it with Joel during his visit in Cambridge, UK. It would be beneficial to see Test Description on Test Set Run view (above the steps). Test Descrption contains essential test information and having them visible on this screen would help to understand the context of the steps without need to click multiple times to see it. Hoovering in upper right corner shows that, however it is unreadable in some cases.

    0 votes
    Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    0 comments  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →

    Hi Kuba,

    We would like to update you that we added a new System Field – “Pre Conditions”, which now available to use.
    Although this is not exactly what you meant in your request, you should know that you can find this field above the first step of your test, so it can be useful for your purpose.
    By the way, another option is to hover “Test in Test Library” while running and see all the values that given for entire fields, include the Test Description field.

    Hope this will be helpful.

    Thanks,
    Itai

  20. Right now we can modify email notifications for pretty much everything (including batch edit) but unfortunately, not batch delete. It would be great to have the option to disable the notification for batch delete.

    0 votes
    Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    1 comment  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
  • Don't see your idea?