General

General

Categories

  1. It would be nice if we can use Markdown in comment or any text fields.

    4 votes
    Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    under review  ·  0 comments  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →

    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
  2. based on the issue severity and its probability enable users to sort by Issues risks

    3 votes
    Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    under review  ·  0 comments  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →

    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
  3. Add more filtering options like: "has"(If a searched text is a part of the entire text), "greater\ less than"(for integers), "Doesn't have"(same as the "has" but the opposite), etc.

    3 votes
    Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    under review  ·  0 comments  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →

    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
  4. When editing a testset usually you have to navigate through a number of test listing pages of a specific view you have already selected. When you are doing this, the most comfortable setting is to hide the views box because the box is only taking space you need to fully read the tests names. However, each time you change between pages, the views box is made visible again (which is very annoying). I propose you keep the state of the views box when the page is changed. If it is hidden, then it should stay hidden until you need it…

    3 votes
    Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    1 comment  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →

    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    under review  ·  joel responded

    Sounds like something pretty reasonable. We will look when can we implement this soon.

  5. (1) link test cases to externally stored requirements (In fogbugz) and push the externally stored requirement data into Practitest requirements for reporting/dashboard.
    (2) Add a Push link next to the Defects field in the Test Run Result screen which pushes a bug report to the external system (FogBugz) without leaving Practitest and make a copy in 'Issues' at the same time for reporting/dashboard.
    (3) Hyperlinks to externally held data if only linking to issues/requirements in the external system and not pushing data to and fro (hovering the mouse cursor over a fogbugz case ID in either issues or requirements screen…

    3 votes
    Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    under review  ·  0 comments  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →

    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
  6. When using the Redmine 2-way integration, currently users need to go back to Redmine in order to see the bug list or in order to edit the bugs.

    It would be very helpful if Practitest users would be able to view and edit the bugs from the "Issues" tab or even view them on the different dashboard widgets.

    3 votes
    Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    under review  ·  0 comments  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →

    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
  7. Support multiple page edit in the test instance grid like we have in the test library grid OR batch edit for all instances in a filter

    3 votes
    Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    under review  ·  0 comments  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →

    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
  8. For example:
    I have 1 Custom field browser (list) that have some values in it (Chrome, Firefox Safari etc.)
    I set that custom field on the screen:
    - Test
    - Instance
    - Issue

    When I Create new Test and I set the Browser: Firefox when im done with the Test --> Il Create TestSet & Instance = When im in the instance screen I see the Custom field Browser thats already filled in with 'Firefox' that I have selected in the screen Test.

    Start the instance and there is a Issue --> Create an Issue, Open the Issue screen and…

    3 votes
    Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    under review  ·  0 comments  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →

    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
  9. It would be useful to have some kind of text summary next to graph in Dashboard:

    Example: "this and that test was failed because issue-x (minor), but the build is still released."

    Could you please add this feature to the Dashboard?

    -Ossi

    3 votes
    Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    0 comments  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →

    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    under review  ·  Christine responded

    Hi Ossi,

    We will review your feature request and will get back to you.

    Best regards,
    Christine

  10. 3 votes
    Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    under review  ·  0 comments  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →

    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
  11. As a tester, I would like to be able to use the 'linked bug' flag in a filter selection criteria on tests
    This would enable me to find tests that may have been marked as 'passed' as they meet the release criteria, but still may have minor issues outstanding against them. i.e. create a filter of tests that have a linked bugs regardless of the test 'run status'.

    3 votes
    Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    under review  ·  1 comment  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →

    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
  12. Include in Batch Edit for Test Library the possibility to add a requirement to several Tests at the same time.

    On the same way, Include in Batch Edit for Requirements the possibility to add a Test to several requirements at the same time.

    Currently it has to be done one by one.

    3 votes
    Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    2 comments  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →

    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    under review  ·  Christine responded

    Hi Angela,

    Thanks for your feature request.

    Kindly note that you can add requirements, tests via the ‘Traceability’ tab, but that’s correct that you need to add one by one.

    We have a similar feature request where customers asking about ability to add all tests/requirements residing in a specific filter to a test/requirement. This feature is similar to the feature we have in Test Sets & Runs when you can add all tests residing in a filter to Test Set.

    Will this feature work for you?

    Best regards,
    Christine

  13. There should be a project summary section on Summary Home page, which Overview the whole project, such as Project Name, Project Start date, Project End Date, Estimates Time (All Runs), Actual TIme (All Runs), Assigned to, Project Closure Notes / Comments, etc.

    3 votes
    Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    under review  ·  2 comments  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →

    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
  14. When I was setting up test folder, I would click on the + sign and start typing. Then I would look and realize that I was not really typing in any field. Please make sure the Folder Name field is active when creating new folder. That was the user does not have to click in the field (the only field) to name it and move on.

    3 votes
    Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    0 comments  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →

    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
  15. We discussed it with Joel during his visit in Cambridge, UK. It would be beneficial to see Test Description on Test Set Run view (above the steps). Test Descrption contains essential test information and having them visible on this screen would help to understand the context of the steps without need to click multiple times to see it. Hoovering in upper right corner shows that, however it is unreadable in some cases.

    3 votes
    Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    0 comments  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →

    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    Hi Kuba,

    We would like to update you that we added a new System Field – “Pre Conditions”, which now available to use.
    Although this is not exactly what you meant in your request, you should know that you can find this field above the first step of your test, so it can be useful for your purpose.
    By the way, another option is to hover “Test in Test Library” while running and see all the values that given for entire fields, include the Test Description field.

    Hope this will be helpful.

    Thanks,
    Itai

  16. I would like to be able to see (and report on) the issue titles and the issue ID number, for issues that are linked to tests (this is especially important for projects that do not have a 2 way issue integration)
    If just the issue ID is shown, it means always having to spend time looking up what that issue is.
    It is also important to be able to export & print a list of this information and would also be useful to be able to create a filter which allows it to be shown on dashboards.

    3 votes
    Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    under review  ·  1 comment  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →

    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
  17. Add possibility of tag searching in whole system. Not within one project.

    3 votes
    Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    under review  ·  0 comments  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →

    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
  18. Is it possible to add the following feature to the 2 way integration with YouTrack.
    Once user add steps to requirement that was linked to YouTrack, the steps will be displayed in the YouTrack ticket as well.

    As currently exist in the JIRA 2 way integration.

    Thanks

    3 votes
    Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    under review  ·  1 comment  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →

    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
  19. Show Progress on how many test cases / test steps are done / still to go when running the actual test.
    right now I have to stop the test and call the parent screen to see the Progress of the current test...

    3 votes
    Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    under review  ·  0 comments  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →

    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
  20. The possibility of adding files up to 25MB, so that can include heavier movie files with testing journeys etc.

    3 votes
    Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    under review  ·  0 comments  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →

    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
  • Don't see your idea?